Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

Semantic matches for “chromosomes and plant classification”

Showing matches 81–100 among up to the top 200 ranked results.
Semantic results are ranked by similarity of meaning rather than exact wording, so relevant pages may use different language from your query. They are a discovery aid, not an exhaustive list of relevant pages.
← Previous
of 10
Next →
View page 2 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #1159 · File: 27_Morrison_Bx7FF3r
Collection-level dates: 1915–1965, n.d.
Matched passage
From Reports of the Sessions of the Societe de Biologie, Volume XIX, No 38 January 4, 1929----1923-1931 Contribution to the study of chromosomes among Iris Report of Marc Simonet, presented by A. Guilliermond In a former report,(1), we gave the results of our first studies in the enumeration of chromosomes among Iris. Since those studies, we have been able to make observations also among Iris apparently not hitherto studied. Most of these plants belong to important collections of the experimental work of the Etablissements Vilmorin, at Verrières-le- Buisson (Val-d'Oise) At this time of the year we have been able …
View page 72 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4666 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx2FF27_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
His connection with plants therefore was with a different set of plant materials than he would have found occurring in the temperate parts of Europe. So either Linnaeus' or Tournefort's systems of classification sort of fell flat on their face as when he wanted to make a classification of the plants that he found in the tropics. So when he discovered his that his classification system had to be something different, I can't imagine what background he had, it would be interesting as a historical study to know how Adanson was backed up with ideas from other people. We don't have that available to us now, so we just …
View page 19 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #962 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF7r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
Although To synthesize the cytological background of evolving plant taxonomy. Plant taxonomy is a derived subject with a long history To synthesize present knowledge but polyploidy is an evolutionary process. Although polyploidy is one of the most important phenomena of evolution, the immense knowledge collected by workers all over the world has been synthesized only twice, in 1936 by Bünziger and in 1950 by Stebbins, although shorter reviews of some of its processes have also been published. Polyploidy is distributed. Cytotaxial = physiological sex determination in plants? Together with Goslanski?
View page 7 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #964 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF9r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
… views in Tabulae Biologicae, a publication which now is extremely rare and difficult to find even in university libraries. Later, in 1950, Tischler also published a list of chromosome numbers of the higher plants from Central Europe. Four chromosome lists were published, from 1926 to 1934, by the Canadian botanist Gaiser, and the French cytologist Delay compiled, in 1950, a list to cover the period from Tischler's list (1938) up to 1949. Other chromosome indexes covering selected parts of the world's flora have been published, e.g., for the cultivated plants of Japan by Kihara, Yamamoto, and Hosono (1931), for cu …
View page 50 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #961 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF6r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
Biosynthetic VII Species hybrids I have mentioned previously that although plants with different chromosome numbers may be crossed, they then hybrids are actually sterile, so that their genes cannot be mixed or recombined. With other words, chromosomes with differences may allow crossability but not meiosis. Chromosome numbers vary from 2 = 2 in the Ascaris, which is more intestinal worm? The horse, (2 = 4, the Equine Hyalopogon prorius), to 2 = 1200, in the Indian fox Cynipiform reticulata. Nevertheless, there are many examples of such animals and plants having the same chromosome number species, that it is unav …
View page 4 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4714 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx4FF5_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
PROCESSING TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS (1) Plants to be classified (2) Assemble data (morphologic, genetic, ecologic, physiologic, etc. Organize for processing (3) Determine related and unrelated elements (4) Cluster (5) Organization into "formal" classification (6) Nomenclature problems (7) Identification routines (8) Application (9) Breeding programs, Analysis of drug-producing plants, etc. Evolutionary studies Ecological studies Information retrieval David J. Rogers Professor of Botany December 2, 1965
View page 36 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #961 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF6r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
… y secondary. The occurrence of a multiple chromosome n'ts series is known as polyploidy (Winkler 1916) and it represents a highly interesting regularity. This phenomenon occurs in a vast majority of higher plants known; it is more frequent under extreme conditions, and is typical of many ornamental plants. In the wheat, the diploid wheats are most primitive and of little use at present. In the cereals, the diploids (Avena) and the tetraploids (Triticum) are the Mediterranean and Egyptian cereals, whereas the hexaploids are the modern breadwheats (Triticum). In several other cases, for instance in oats (Avena), we …
View page 43 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4232 · File: 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF72_r
Collection-level dates: 1923–1963
Matched passage
136 Revue Internationale des Industries Agricoles L 691°. — G. LAWRENCE. — INTRODUCTION TO PLANT TAXONOMY. (Introduction à la taxonomie des plantes). — Macmillan C°, New-York, éd., 1955. — Un vol., 179 p., 69 fig. (In-8/11.501). Classification des plantes. Evolution et unifiés de classification. Structure des plantes. Techniques de la collection et de l'identification. Nomenclature. Phylogénie et biosystématique. Taxonomie dans l'Amérique du Nord. Familles importantes et leurs caractères. I. 692°. — T. H. GOODSPED. — THE GENUS NICOTIANA. ORIGINS, RELATIONSHIPS AND EVOLUTION OF ITS SPECIES IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR DI …
View page 141 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4708 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx3FF31_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
… d progenies obtained. All sexual x sexual crosses had sterile F1s; most fertile F1s yielded high proportion of maternal F2. Clausen, J., Keck, D.D., & Hiesey, W.M. (1940). Experimental studies on the nature of species I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 520:1-452. Drymocallis glandulosa, pp. 26-124: taxonomic review, transplant studies, discussion; ecotypes formed all at diploid level. Potentilla gracilis complex, pp. 125-175: taxonomic revision, very high chromosome numbers and some aneuploids, transplant studies, discussion. P. drummondii and P. breweri,
View page 54 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #976 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF21r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
2a. It has been said, that there are as many concepts of the basic categories of plant classification as that a distinct designation of each of these is not necessary. That is a truth with considerable modifications, although it may fit too much to the application of the descriptive method when used for little known taxa. Although Linnaeus never directly defined his categories, it is implicit in his work that he was thinking of a certain degree of relationship and phylogeny at the levels beyond the genus, and such an idea has been increasingly basic to most taxonomic work by later generations. But when the knowle …
View page 3 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4644 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx2FF6_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
THE NATURAL SYSTEM OF A. L. JUSSIEU The system of A. L. Jussieu is expounded in his Genera plantarum secundum, Paris 1791. There are 15 classes, 100 order, and 136 genera incertae sedis INDEX METHODI Acotyledones................................................. Class I Monocotyledones.............................................. {Stamina Hypogyna Perigyna Epigyna Dicotyledones.............................................. {Stamina Epigyna Perigyna Hypogyna Corolla Hypocyna Perigyna antheris Monopetalae............................................... X Polypetalae.................................................. …
View page 199 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4666 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx2FF27_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
PAGE 8 our classification. What is it intrinsically, what are the intrinsic characters of this plant which make all of these plants related and unrelated and everything else? But I can't see how except that's purely arbitrary you can separate the intrinsic from the extrinsic. (Henry) It is in many ways arbitrary; just as it is in trying to classify a collection of books, but there are certain characters which are a part of the genetic makeup of that plant. All of sorts of accidents can happen to the plant otherwise. We do have to at some point make what is largely an arbitrary decision. Many of these things I hav …
View page 14 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4626 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx1FF20_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
… ferences reconciled. Why, one asks, were not both sets of data run together? The authors do not seem aware that, having used nearly 50% of the information on leaf characters, they have heavily weighted the classifications toward the vegetative information about the plants. This, in itself, could help to explain why their various results do not agree with the earlier classifications where I am sure the authors considered reproductive or chromosomal differences uppermost. Furthermore, in nearly every case of the measurement characters, they have duplicated the character in such a way that they have introduced false …
View page 74 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #3748 · File: AD283_r
Collection-level dates: 1724–1848
Matched passage
12: class. A Corolle Composée a fleurmy Section 1: Xanthium. ambreine (Flumme/berley) 4. 2. carduus, cynara, Lappa, cynya, Senecio 3. Carthamus, atkinsonian. Tanacetum (Sem pappo) 4. Echinops. (Flum exopm) 5 calyci-äckin 5. Scabiosa. Diplophy. globularia, Echinops a Semiflurmy Sect.1: Leontodon. Lactuca. Cogonaria. Trago peganum (Frago) 2. cichorium, Latanana. Lampana. Sedum (Cinnam) radiee - Sect. 1: aster. Virginica. jasminea. Dornic. Pustely. (Sem pappo) 2. Zagete. Comsfolly 3. Belty. millet. chamomilium 4. Caltha 5. xeranthemum. carline. (Silbyxland/petals) 15: Sans Corolle a 18-19, 16: Sans corolle et sans c …
View page 70 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #976 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF21r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
5. Since the tribe Tristiceae includes one of the most recently described and numerous genera, especially of secundiflorous species (e.g., Stegneria, etc.), its classification into a distinctly phylogenetic system is highly desirable. Although numerous geneticists have made efforts to establish crossability between the various diploid and polyploid species of the complex, considerable evidence exists that such hybrids have long been known to occur under natural conditions (Fosse 1881). During the past three or four decades many geneticists have not only continued their investigations but also employed these hybri …
View page 15 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #3731 · File: AD263_r
Collection-level dates: 1724–1848
Matched passage
… exprimé dans un seul nom qui lui soit particulier. Mais il n'oublie pas encore déterminé d'où ce caractère essentiel doit être tiré. Le vœu veut que ce soit indistinctement de quelque une des parties de la plante; les autres décident qu'il sera d'une seule partie spécifiée de la fructification. D'autre enfin poussent la rigueur du principe beaucoup plus loin; ils prétendent que le caractère essentiel des classes doit être tiré d'une seule partie de la fructification, celui des ordres de cette partie, le caractère générique de tout; enfin le spécifique de toutes les autres parties invariables de la plante. De là l …
View page 35 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #1005 · File: 319_Love_Bx2FF50r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
535 HEILBORN, O. 1936: The mechanics of so-called secondary association between chromosomes. - Hereditas 22: 167 - 188. - 1937: Notes on chromosome associations. - Cytologia, Fuji Jub. Vol.: 9 - 13. - 1939: Chromosome studies in Cyperaceae. III - IV. - Hereditas 25: 224 - 241. - 1941: Some chromosome numbers in Draba. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 35: 141 - 142. - 1943: Inversions in Paris quadrifolia. - Hereditas 29: 498 - 499. HEIMBURGER, M. 1959: Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Anemone. - Canad. J. Bot. 37: 507 - 612. - 1962: Comparison of chromosome size in species of Anemone and their hybrids. - Chromosoma 13: 32 …
View page 196 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4666 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx2FF27_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
… we keep that in the back of our minds and we can perhaps whether justifiably or unjustifiably infer that maybe the others are the same. (Student) I think to go out on a limb and say that seeds tell me that plant distribution is valid as a key to the identification plant. (Henry) It is, but we are not talking about identification, we are talking about classification now. And it is real handy to know that a certain group of plants only exist in Australia. It limits our searching. We can use that definitely in a key for identification. (Student) But doesn't this fact that they are located only in one place imply tha …
View page 41 and transcription
Item/Folder: "Yugoslavia"
Digital Object: DO #963 · File: 319_Love_Bx1FF8r
Collection-level dates: 1950–1987
Matched passage
25. LÖVE, A., LÖVE, D., MAYER, E. & SUŠNIK, F. 1972: Cytotaxonomy of Yugoslavian plants: Introductory remarks. - Scopolia 1: xxx - xxx. LÖVE, A., LÖVE, D. & SUŠNIK, F. 1972: Nomenclatural adjustments in the Yugoslavian flore. I. Some monocotyledons from Slovenia. - Scopolia 1: xx-xx MATHER, K. 1932: Chromosome variation in Crocus. I. - Journ. Genet. 26:120-142. MILLER, E. W. 1930: A preliminary note on the cytology of the Melanthioideae section of the Liliaceae. - Proc. Durham Philos. Soc. 8: 267 - 271. MODELIEWSKI, J. 1910: Weitere Beiträge zur Embryobildung einiger Euphorbiaceen. - Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 28: 4 …
View page 28 and transcription
Digital Object: DO #4718 · File: 231_Rogers_Bx4FF9_r
Collection-level dates: 1948–1977
Matched passage
ultimate form. Early classifications aimed mainly at identification - either to categorize organisms according to their usages, or for pigeon-holing purposes. A latter-day variation is the goal of purely phenetic classification or assortment only, based upon all available data, all characters counted as equal in importance. Modern "biological" classifications, on the contrary, emphasize evolution. Concepts of primitiveness and specialization play a role, and some characters are more important than others in showing relationships. Even evolutionary taxonomists are not agreed, however, on whether the classification …
← Previous
of 10
Next →