Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 29 · DO #3959 · 296_Lowy_Bx3FF26_r

Collection
Bernard Lowy (1916–1992) papers
Item/Folder
Daime Cult. Acre. Econ. Bot.; Thieret '87, 1970–1989
Digital Object
DO #3959, page 29
Collection-level dates
1949–1990
Open PDF at page 29 ↗

Page transcription

Botany

keep their own supply of shinā and sniff it mainly in the afternoon and evenings when they have finished their work. To us, the most serious aspect of the Jamamadis' usage of shinā is its use by even small children. One four-year-old seemed to take it daily, and many other children had their own bottles of snuff which we were able to trade with them, in exchange for brightly colored material, coins which they use as pendants, fish hooks, candies, and other trade goods which we always carry when visiting Indians.

Medicines. As is the case in most Indian tribes, the Jamamadis have many medicinal plants which they use to cure almost any of the common ailments. We collected their cures for coughs, sore throats, rheumatic pains, and worm infestations. One apparently effective medicine is their toothache cure which they call "Washi," using the root of a species of Piper, a relative of the condiment pepper. A small piece of root is chewed and, when placed on the tooth, gives immediate relief. When we tried this root it produced a tingling sensation in the tongue and gums, and had a definite anesthetic effect.

Pottery. An intriguing plant use is the hardener which several tribes use in their excellent ceramics. The bark of the "Caripé" tree, Licania octandra, a member of the plant family Chrysobalanaceae, is rich in silica grain (sand) which is widely used in hardening pottery. A fire is made exclusively of "Caripé" bark, and the resulting ash is sifted in a basket-work sieve before being mixed with the pottery clay. The ceramics containing this ash are much harder than others and they have a metallic ring.

We often tend to dismiss Indians as "primitive people," but their plant uses demonstrate that they are a people highly adapted to their environment, drawing much from it. They remember, too, the possibility of exhausting it. □

Acknowledgments
Dr. Ghillean T. Prance, B.A. Krukoff Curator of Amazonian Botany at the New York Botanical Garden, gratefully acknowledges support of his field work by NSF grant GB-18653 and also wishes to thank the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia in Manaus for co-sponsorship of the field program. Especial thanks are due to the two people who arranged and set up the expedition for Dr. Prance and his wife to the Jamamadis, Mr. Fred Orr, missionary of Lábrea and Sr. Moacir Canizo de Brito, owner of Seringal Jurucuá where the Jamamadi Indians live.