Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 34 · DO #4031 · 296_Lowy_Bx5FF17_r

Collection
Bernard Lowy (1916–1992) papers
Item/Folder
Franz Oberwinkler 1978 →; Mycology K. Wells, February 1978 – October 1983
Digital Object
DO #4031, page 34
Collection-level dates
1949–1990
Open PDF at page 34 ↗

Page transcription

Department of Botany
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE
BATON ROUGE · LOUISIANA · 70803
504/388-8485

19-I-1981

Prof. Dr. F. Oberwinkler
Universität Tübingen
Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik
Institut für Biologie 1
D 7400 Tübingen 1
Auf der Morgenstelle 1
DDR

Dear Franz:

I am glad to know of your continued interest in TEM/SEM studies
of tremellaceous fungi, and shall gladly send you the type of Phyllogloea
singeri of which you may take a fragment for your examination. I have
all the type material of Neotremella which I shall eventually share with
Dr. Guzman, but I prefer to take it down to Mexico personally (probably
this summer) rather than risk its loss in the mail. I have had some bad
experiences with the Mexican mail service. Meanwhile I am sending you a
part of the rather large collection of Neotremella guzmanii Lowy for
your TEM study. There is sufficient material of this, so that you may
take a part of it for your herbarium.

I believe that I sent you a reprint of my Neotremella paper with
the extremely poor reproductions of my photographs, the originals of
which were not quite so bad!

I am awaiting the arrival of the bulk of my Amazonian collections
so that I can begin examining the tremellaceous fungi, a few of which may
be of special interest.

Please let me know as soon as the small package with the types
reaches you.

With best regards,
B. Lowy