Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

plant collecting and fieldwork in South America medicinal, culinary, or other traditional uses of plants chromosomes and plant classification early herbals and botanical illustrations botanical institutions exchanging plants, seeds, and specimens microscopy and photomicrography in botanical research How did botanists and gardeners introduce plants from one region to another? grafting, budding, and propagation of tropical fruit crops

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 76 · DO #4031 · 296_Lowy_Bx5FF17_r

Collection
Bernard Lowy (1916–1992) papers
Item/Folder
Franz Oberwinkler 1978 →; Mycology K. Wells, February 1978 – October 1983
Digital Object
DO #4031, page 76
Collection-level dates
1949–1990
Open PDF at page 76 ↗

Page transcription

Department of Botany
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE
BATON ROUGE · LOUISIANA · 70803
504/388-8485

30-IV-1981

Dr. F. Oberwinkler
Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik
und Botanischer Garten
Universität Tübingen
Auf der Morgenstelle 1
D 7400 Tübingen 1, West Germany

Dear Franz,

Many thanks for sending me the manuscript of your fine paper! It is a very significant, meticulous study with first rate illustrations, as in all of your work. I am flattered that you should consider inviting me to be a co-author. It is certainly most generous of you, in view of the fact that I have contributed nothing to all the work that you have put into it with so much care. The Heterobasidiomycetes are very close to my heart, but my position regarding their taxonomy (as I outlined in my 1968 paper in TAXON, and repeated in 1971 in FLORA NEOTROPICA) is perhaps not a very popular one! Nevertheless I remain convinced that my approach is a valid one. In any event, it would be an honor for me to be associated with you in this work.

At your suggestion, I have taken the liberty of making a few routine editorial changes for your consideration. Most of them are quite trivial, and none of them affect the main presentation or conclusions in any way. I have made these notations on a xerox copy of your original, so that you may accept or reject them as you see fit. Your comment on p.4 of the manuscript, pointing out that "Syzygospora alba" sometimes partly cruciate-septate basidial apices can be found.....which appear Metabourdotia-like" I consider highly significant. Since Metabourdotia is such a curious genus, and one still not commonly known among mycologists, it may be helpful to cite Olive's paper in which it was first described (ie Olive, L.S. 1957. Tulasnellaceae of Tahiti. A revision of the family. in MYCOLOGIA 49: 663-679.)

I have kept another xerox copy of the manuscript with my notations, so that if you have any questions you may refer directly to the paper without having to send me another copy.

If you decide to submit the paper to MYCOLOGIA (Dr. T. Johnson, ed.) it could be retyped essentially as you have it in the original manuscript, only incorporating some of my suggestions. However, if you choose to send it to MYCOTAXON (Dr. R. Korf, ed.) (for more rapid publication) it must be retyped on special paper (I am enclosing some for you that I happen to have on hand) leaving appropriate, measured spaces in the text for insertion of the illustrations. It would be best to consult MYCOTAXON 1(1), 1974 for details.

With kindest regards,
as ever,
mit herzlichen Grüßen
Dr. Bernard