Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

plant collecting and fieldwork in South America medicinal, culinary, or other traditional uses of plants chromosomes and plant classification early herbals and botanical illustrations botanical institutions exchanging plants, seeds, and specimens microscopy and photomicrography in botanical research How did botanists and gardeners introduce plants from one region to another? grafting, budding, and propagation of tropical fruit crops

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 59 · DO #4173 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx1FF11_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Digilio–DuBridge, 1948–1957
Digital Object
DO #4173, page 59
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 59 ↗

Page transcription

2079 Life Sciences Building
University of California
Berkeley, California
February 19, 1957

Dr. Antonio Digilio
Fundacion Miguel Lillo
Miguel Lillo 205
Tucuman, Argentina

Dear Antonio:

Thank you and Dr. Hayward very much for all your efforts to arrange that I come to Tucuman under the Smith-Mundt program.

I am really ashamed of the way in which my government acts in such matters. In the bulletin of the Smith-Mundt Act which I sent you there was no indication that the Embassy in the country concerned had anything to do with the selection or financing of appointees. I have had similar experiences with Washington not only in my own case but also in the case of others. It is too bad that "democracy" always seems to breed bureaucracy with consequent complications in administration of programs, national and international.

I think that it is extremely unlikely that before January 1, 1957, all funds for Argentina in 1957 under the Smith-Mundt Act had been assigned. I suspect that the Embassy in Buenos Aires simply did not want to be bothered with making arrangements in my case.

Late in December the Guggenheim Foundation gave me a Fellowship grant for my South American proposals. In addition, from other sources, I have funds sufficient to take with me for collecting in Peru, Chile and Argentina two North American assistants. I plan to spend the period from September 15 of this year to March 15, 1958, in South America. Probably I will divide my time almost equally among the three countries -- i.e., visit Argentina between January 15 and March 15.

On the 1957-58 expedition the objective will be research on problems of plant distribution in the Andes rather than Nicotiana collecting. In Argentina I will be particularly interested in having collections made up to the limits of vegetation in what was formerly called Prov. Los Andes, particularly near the passes over to Chile, to compare the species there with those on the Chilean side in Provs. Tarapaca and Antofagasta. This would probably mean that for a time I and my collectors would make Tucuman our headquarters.

Perhaps your Instituto might be interested in cooperating in the Prov. Los Andes collecting unless you already have in your herbarium all the material from that area which you need. By