Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 88 · DO #4179 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx1FF17_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Gregg–Guggenheim Foundation, 1946–1959
Digital Object
DO #4179, page 88
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 88 ↗

Page transcription

Research projects -- South America, 1957-58
T.H.Goodspeed

Argentina
Herbarium studies, primarily at Smirniguy Tucuman (Instituto Lillo), Buenos Aires, La Plata and Santiago, necessary for completion of a monograph on the role of geographic and genetic isolation and on the influence of polymorphism and transAndine migration as shown by the distribution and relationships of the Argentine-Chilean species of Nicotiana and related genera Patunia, Castrum and Fabiana.

Chile
Evidence of major and relatively recent climatic alteration in north central Chile is seen in the presence of a few restricted areas in its semi-desert containing depauperate but otherwise characteristic species peculiar to the Chilean temperate rain forest some 600 miles to the south. That there was, similarly, retreat of a subantarctic vegetation from southern Chile is suggested by preliminary determination of the presence of species of subantarctic origin in the isolated, unique and previously little known flora of the Cordillera Pelada in Prov. Valdivia (41°S). To verify the presence of a subantarctic element in the evolution of the coastal floras of Chile the relation of the Cordillera Pelada flora to the composition of the surrounding temperate rain forest will be intensively studied.

Peru
In 1942-43 collections were made of the largely unknown vegetation on the altiplano of northwestern Dept. Puno from the Cordillera Carabaya eastward to the Rio Inhambari. The evidence obtained points to relationships between species of that Peruvian altiplano and those of the better known altiplano of adjacent Bolivia. It suggests that the role of high plateaus established prior to recent vertical uplift as ancient pathways of transAndine plant dispersal. Additional collecting in Dept. Puno will be carried on to permit more complete comparison of the two floras involved.

All field data will be vouchered by herbarium material and photographs. Where possible duplicate herbarium material will be obtained for distribution to South American and North American herbaria and to specialists concerned with South American plant taxonomy and phytogeography.

As in the past, assistance in carrying on the proposed field work will be made available through the cooperation of the governments of the three Republics and other institutions and agencies.