Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 6 · DO #4182 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx1FF20_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Hugill–Jermy, 1941–1958
Digital Object
DO #4182, page 6
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 6 ↗

Page transcription

Berkeley 4, California
June 6, 1951

Mr. E. C. Hummel
4848 Imperial Highway
Inglewood, California

Dear Mr. Hummel:

Through Mr. Paul Hutchison, Botanist of this Botanical Garden,
exchange of plant material with you has, with my approval, been
under way for some time. I hope that this exchange has proved
of value to you as it has to us.

In the last fifteen years I have directed five plant hunting
expeditions in South America. We worked principally on the west
coast and brought back to Berkeley large collections of scientific
and other importance. These expeditions were largely financed by
private individuals who gave money to the University of California
for this purpose.

I propose to do more collecting this fall (September-January) in
Chile and nearby parts of Peru and Argentina if I can secure the
necessary funds. I want to take Mr. Hutchison with me in order to
emphasize collecting of new or little known cacti and mapping of
the cactus flora of western South America. We will operate mostly
in areas which are unknown botanically or where no one has paid
much attention to cacti.

We will collect herbarium specimens, living plants and seeds. All
these collections will be the property of this University. Living
plants and seeds will be grown in the Botanical Garden; surplus
material if and when available, will be sent on request to other
Botanical Gardens and to those financing the expedition.

For the last three months Mr. Hutchison has been compiling a list
of localities where collecting should be important and I am sending
him east in a few weeks to get more information in herbaria there.
As a result we ought to be better prepared than anyone who has gone
to Chile and adjacent regions in the past to select the most critical
areas for cactus collecting. My long acquaintance with government
officials and membership in scientific societies in Peru, Chile and
Argentina will assure maximum local cooperation, something important
in South America.

The cost of transportation to and from and in South America, of
maintenance there, of hire of local assistants, guides and pack trains
and of air express of living plants to Berkeley will total $4800. I
hope that you may wish to provide this sum or a substantial part of
Such donation will be received and acknowledged by the Regents of the
University, will be expended only on my requisition and will be deduct-
ible from income tax.

THG:T
Sincerely,