Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 62 · DO #1204 · 35_Scott_Bx2FFIreneer

Collection
Arthur Moreland Scott (1888–1963) papers
Item/Folder
"Fr. Irénée-Marie" (1889–1960), 1950–1960
Digital Object
DO #1204, page 62
Collection-level dates
1953–1963
Open PDF at page 62 ↗

Page transcription

May 24 1950

Dear Frere Irenée-Marie,

I am sorry that I cannot give you permission to publish any of the desmid in the collections that I sent you, for the reason that I expect to publish all of them myself, sooner or later; a few of them in my own name, and the remainder in collaboration with Prescott or someone else. I sent you the samples simply for your own pleasure and edification, as I have sent similar boxes of samples to Teiling, Grünblad, Brunel, Bourrelly, Buzicks, Sampsoio, Sachlan in Buitenzorg, and Ophel in Australia. But I am sure that you will derive a great deal of enjoyment from their examination, even though it may be tantalizing to see so many new and unfamiliar forms without being able to describe them.

Dr. Brunel is not working on my Micrasterias, but on his own specimens from Canada. I sent him some gatherings which contain a wide range of Micrasterias species so that he might compare the sub-tropical forms from Louisiana, Mississippi and Florida with the Canadian plants. As you say, he is so methodical and painstaking that there is no telling when he will publish his results. Furthermore, he told me when I met him in New York, that so much of his time is now taken up with the administrative duties of the Institut Botanique that he has practically no time left for research. For this reason he was thinking of recording his results by means of photomicrographs instead of camera lucida drawings. I should not think that would be very satisfactory, because no photograph can show the fine details on which a positive determination frequently depends.

As to your problem of finding a review which will accept scientific manuscript in French, I wish to suggest La Revue Algologique, which resumed publication last year I believe. The Directeur is Robert Lami, Laboratoire de Cryptogamie, 18 rue de Buffon, Paris 5e, France. Also there is the journal Hydrobiologia, published by Uitgiverij Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag, Holland, which publishes papers in English, French and German, also Italian I believe. Dr. Wm. Randolph Taylor is on the Board of Editors of Hydrobiologia, and you might write to him for further information.

I think you are right in your resolve to continue writing in French. For my part I can read French almost as easily as English, though I cannot speak it, or write it except in a schoolboyish manner. German I read with a little more difficulty, but my knowledge of French and German enables me to make out the sense of scientific papers in several other languages; Danish, Norwegian and Swedish which are related to German, and Portuguese and Spanish which are related to French. Of course I cannot pretend to understand every word, but at least I can get the general meaning. This is not the case with the Slavic languages, of which I know nothing whatever. I have received several papers written in Czech, which might as well be Sanskrit.

Under separate cover I am sending you prints of six plates for a forthcoming paper by Prescott and myself on Micrasterias. Note that the names which I have placed on them are tentative, and subject to final determination by Prescott.

With my best regards, sincerely yours,