Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 77 · DO #4183 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx1FF21_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Jessup–Junge, 1939–1959
Digital Object
DO #4183, page 77
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 77 ↗

Page transcription

May 6, 1948.

Mr. Rodney Wilcox Jones,
American Orchid Society,
100 Broadview Avenue,
New Rochelle, New York.

Dear Mr. Jones,

Thank you for your letter of April 21 concerning support of this Botanical Garden-plant exploration in Peru.

As indicated in my letter of March 17, I wish to secure sufficient funds to continue Woytkowski's plant collecting in Peru on a more satisfactory financial basis. I estimate that $5,000 will be required to carry it on for a twelve months period beginning July 1. By a twelve months period I mean a total of twelve months actual collecting. As you know collecting, especially in the tropical rain forest, is successful only during certain times in the year. Therefore, the total of twelve months might extend over two calendar years.

In my previous letter I also said that what I propose is a strictly scientific project. Donations of funds are to be made to this University and thus become deductible from income tax. This University, however, will become in no way responsible for the success of the project nor will it guarantee that living plants or other material will be distributed to donors. On the other hand, there is a reasonable expectation that Woytkowski will be able to collect sufficient duplicates so that donors will, to a limited extent, share in the products of the collecting. In the past institutions in this country and abroad and private individuals have been sufficiently interested in increase of knowledge of the vegetation of South America to give large sums of money with no strings of any sort attached.

I might say that I have directed four successful plant explorations primarily on the West Coast of South America and have personally worked down there for a total of over four years in the last twelve years. Much of this time has been spent in Peru which our expeditions have covered quite thoroughly. Continuation of Woytkowski's collecting, therefore, will be based upon a large accumulation of information as to the most potentially important areas to be worked.

It would seem to me that the American Orchid Society might care to support a project which should yield information of some importance concerning the group of plants with which that organization is concerned.