Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 44 · DO #4187 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx2FF25_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Macbride–Marston, 1945–1957
Digital Object
DO #4187, page 44
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 44 ↗

Page transcription

Berkeley, California
March 9, 1956

Mr. Marshall P. Madison
225 Bush Street
San Francisco, California

Dear Mr. Madison:

At the suggestion of Paul C. Hutchison, Sr. Botanist in this Botanical Garden,
I am outlining below the South American project in the support of which you
expressed interest in a recent conversation with him.

I have been invited by the Chilean Government to spend some months in Chile to
contribute toward realizing the agricultural potential of that republic by
lectures and technical advice. My acceptance will largely depend upon the pos-
sibility of financing the continuation of my studies of the composition and
distribution of the vegetation of Chile and Peru and, if possible, of adjacent
portions of Bolivia and Argentina.

Since 1935 I have directed five botanical expeditions, principally on the West
Coast of South America. You have, I think, a recent publication in which the
maps show the large area covered by these expeditions. Mr. Hutchison accompanied
me on the last expedition, in 1951-52, and proved to be a successful and know-
ledgeable plant collector.

The past expeditions have received wide recognition because of their contributions
to knowledge of the vegetation of previously unexplored or little known South
American areas. In addition to such noteworthy scientific products, new plants of
potential industrial, agricultural and particularly ornamental importance for
California have been found and introduced. To repay in part the sustained coopera-
tion of South American governments I have assisted them in numerous botanical and
agricultural projects.

The five expeditions which have cost a total of over $110,000 were financed entirely
from extrabudgetary sources and principally by donations from private individuals
interested in their objectives.

From July 1956 to February 1957 I propose to explore additional little known areas
in the tropical rain forest on the Peruvian headwaters of the Amazon, on the coasts
and on the slopes of the Andes of Chile and Peru and on the Andean plateaus of the
Chilean, Peruvian, Bolivian and Argentine frontiers. In addition to scientific
products those areas should yield seeds or living plants of trees, shrubs and vines
and in particular of Fuchsias, Orchids, Begonias, Ferns, Cacti and Succulents new to
or otherwise important for California horticulture.

To carry out this proposal Mr. Hutchison's assistance would be desirable because of
his knowledge of the needs of California horticulture and his proven success as a
collector. The services of a second assistant and of two to four local plant col-
lectors in South America would also be required. I estimate that for transportation
of personnel to and in South America, board and lodging, salaries, shipping and care
of plant material after return to California the cost would be $14,500.

I have obtained tentative approval of the above proposal from Prof. L. Constance,
Dean of the College of Letters and Science, and understand that following approval
of the Department of Botany, he will refer it to President Sproul. The expedition
would be designated the "6th University of California Botanical Garden Expedition