Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 24 · DO #4190 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx2FF28_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Mirov–Munoz, 1932–1957
Digital Object
DO #4190, page 24
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 24 ↗

Page transcription

Proposals concerning Distribution of Plant Materials from
the University of California Botanical Garden

I. Nature and source of plant materials available for distribution
The collections in the Botanical Garden are maintained primarily to provide
living material for classroom instruction and research, but also for their
educational value to the visiting public ( estimated 10,000 visitors annually).
Original sources of the collections now under cultivation were: (a) Botanical
Garden collecting expeditions in West China and Tibet, South America and South
Africa; (b) exchange with other Botanical Gardens and similar institutions;
(c) gifts from nurserymen and private individuals; (d) purchase.

Incidental to plant production for classroom instruction and research a
certain amount of duplicate or surplus material may from time to time become
available for distribution. From permanent plantings cut flowers, seeds,
cuttings, etc. can, periodically, be taken.

II. Distribution of above surplus
A. Intramural
1) To other Departments of the University for instruction and research (for
example, Landscape Design, Plant Pathology, Forestry, Entomology, Zoology)
2) To Grounds and Buildings for beautification of the Campus; cut flowers or
other decorative materials to President's House, Chancellor's Office,
Cafeteria, and at times to other administrative offices and for various
University functions
3) To other Campuses (especially Davis) at times

B. Extramural
1) Scientific exchange with other Botanical Gardens and similar institutions
or their individual members (cf. "Seed List" attached)
2) Exchange with commercial firms or individual growers where advantageous
to the Botanical Garden but only in exceptional cases at the discretion of
the Director
3) To local educational institutions for instructional purposes (for example,
Mills College, Oakland Junior College)
4) To such local or national horticultural societies (noncommercial) as
California Horticultural Society, Cactus and Succulent Society, California
Orchid Society, new or little known species of potential ornamental or
other importance introduced by the Botanical Garden, these Societies to take
the full responsibility of distribution to the nursery trade and to
interested individuals
5) To Berkeley Chapter of the American Red Cross for use in military
hospitals through the Junior Red Cross
6) To local religious or charitable organizations upon request and at the
discretion of the Director

III. Sales
In order that new or little known species of potential commercial import-
ance introduced by the Botanical Garden may more rapidly and effectively
reach the nursery trade, plants, cuttings, seeds, etc. will in special cases
and at the discretion of the Director be sold to commercial firms upon
request, i.e. no sales will be solicited. No stock will be grown or main-
tained for this purpose and no materials known to be currently available
in the nursery trade will be sold. Only lots will be sold and at not less
than $100 per lot and $1.50 per unit (plant, cutting, seed packet, etc.).
Billing to purchaser will be made through the Business Office, proceeds to
be credited to Botanical Garden Sales, Account 61275-49060.