Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 42 · DO #1207 · 35_Scott_Bx2FFM-Mcr

Collection
Arthur Moreland Scott (1888–1963) papers
Item/Folder
M-Mc, 1950–1963, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #1207, page 42
Collection-level dates
1953–1963
Open PDF at page 42 ↗

Page transcription

Nov 9 1952

Dr. F. C. Müller-Welchers,
Estacion Atlantida,
R. O. del Uruguay.

Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for your friendly letter of October 11th, and also for the collection of freshwater algae from Las Toscas, which arrived about a week ago. This is a very nice sample, and though it is not especially rich in desmids it contains a good assortment of them. In addition to the ubiquitous forms, I have already noted some rarities, a few of which I cannot immediately identify and which may prove to be new varieties. From the relative abundance of certain desmid genera and species, such as Cosmarium, Euastrum, Netrium, and Desmidium, and the scarcity of others like Staurastrum, Arthrodesmus and Xanthidium, I should judge that this collection came from a peat bog or Sphagnum bog, with acid water of a pH of about 6.5 to 7.0. The diatoms also, though I know little about them, seem to be quite similar to those that I see in soft-water collections from southern USA.

I am surprised to learn that Mr. Thomsen is 75 years old, and that he has not published his drawings of Uruguayan desmids. It seems a pity that such valuable material, representing a large amount of work, should go unpublished. If he does not intend to publish his results, perhaps he would be willing to turn over his drawings and notes to some specialist, like Prof. Gerald W. Prescott who is the best desmidologist in this country, or Dr. Rolf Grönblad of Finland, who is one of the best (perhaps the best) in Europe. A year or so ago I sent Grönblad more than 3000 of my desmid drawings, and over 500 of my collections, which he is going to work up. I am unable to do this properly myself, because I am an engineer, not a botanist. The collection and study of desmids has been my hobby for the last 15 years. The southern part of the USA has been so little explored by algologists that I have found a great many desmid species and varieties that I am quite unable to identify, both from lack of experience, and especially from lack of the world literature, which is unavailable in any of the libraries here. So that is the reason for my collaboration with Prescott and Grönblad.

Your method of bleaching with KMnO4 and M2SO4 is interesting and worth trying, though it seems a little drastic for desmids with their cellulose wall. Also your suggestion of pectin as a mountant is interesting, and this substance can be bought at any corner grocery store. I have also seen cherry gum recommended for the purpose of restricting the movements of protozoa, but this material cannot be bought so far as I know, and cherry trees do not grow here because of the hot climate.

With the same mail I am sending you a vial of Dupont's sodium CMC, also two vials of desmid collections from Florida, which Mr. Thomsen might like to look at, if he still uses the microscope. And if you happen to know some young man or woman, preferably with some knowledge of botany, who would like to make some extra money, I should be glad to pay $50.00 (U.S.) for say 25 collections of desmid material from good habitats similar to Las Toscas.

I used to subscribe to Mikrokosmos, but apparently they suspended publication during the war, and I have not received it since about 1941 or 42. Is it still published by Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung in Stuttgart?

With many thanks, I am,
Yours sincerely,