Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 91 · DO #4209 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF47_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Wallen–Wiel, 1948–1957
Digital Object
DO #4209, page 91
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 91 ↗

Page transcription

2. good in size and number of species. One of the features of this Botanical Garden is a large greenhouse entirely devoted to economic plants and it was quite educational even to a Californian used to seeing olives, citrus fruits, and semi-tropical plants that made dwarfs of the plants exhibited here. The orchid houses are separated from the larger exhibition houses and some nice things were in flower: Calanthe vestichi, Coelogyne massengiana, Oncidium papilio, and one of the finest white flowered orchids I have seen, Cattleya intermedia elba. The benches are slatted and the orchid pots placed on top of inverted pots so that there is more circulation of air and somewhat better spacing of plants. About a foot under the growing bench is another bench filled with charcoal and the damping down water is applied here. Certainly the orchids seemed to be in good condition and very healthy. The cactus and other succulent plants were fair but these plants seem a little bit out of place in eastern Botanical Gardens. Here, as in most of the institutions visited the labelling was very poor. We found the ferns and fern allies very well arranged at the National Herbarium and Killip made us very much at home. Morton is curator of ferns so we had more to do with this Californian from Fresno and the University of California than anyone else at the herbarium. We worked at the herbarium eight and a half hours a day - Alice assisted me - and found the specimens so well arranged and easy to get at that we got done in two weeks all that I expected to do in the whole month of April. We met several of notables here: Swallen, Mrs. Chase, Correll, and so forth. Everyone was nice to us and very helpful. On the evening of our last day at the herbarium Killip invited us to have dinner with him at the Cosmos Club. We accepted and then there started a real wild night in Washington. After dinner and a few drinks at club we started a mad rush around Washington that finally landed us at Killip's apartment where we spent some time. Killip is a very good friend of yours and, after seeing, from West Virginia to Washington, every house where Washington slept, it was a relief to be shown the bed where Harper and Florence Goodspeed slept as pointed out by Killip. Really we all had a wonderful time, so wonderful that it took me a couple of days to get over the experience. Of course, we saw Congress in action, the National Art Gallery, and all that sort of thing. Killip and Alice are about an age, both were born and brought up in Rochester and knew the same people, and they were students at the University of Rochester, Killip '11, Alice '15. After this discovery was made Whitehead was an outsider and plants a mere matter of casual interest.

At New York Botanical Garden we were entertained by Camp and he showed us the high spots of the garden outside and the growing units. He also allowed me to do a little work on Selaginella. We had lunch at the herbarium and met Dr. Stout who wished to be remembered kindly when I wrote to you. However, I was greatly disappointed about New York Botanical Garden. I had always thought of this as being the best botanical garden in the United States. Outside it is rather good but the large conservatories are a mess: plants small and poorly grown and without any sort of arrangement, the begs weedy and most untidy, and the labelling poor indeed. At one time there was, first under Underwood and then with Benedict, a very wonderful collection of ferns and fern allies. Now there is nothing in the fern house except a few tree ferns and a bunch of junk. About ten species of tropical selaginellas are in the collection and about half of them wrongly labelled. The man in charge said the labels fell from the pots and, as he did not know either the ferns or the selaginellas, he had to guess where to place them. There is, however, a remarkable collection of the genus Echeveria, even a better collection than the one we had in Berkeley. Camp is quite a character and vitally interesting. He explained about the work he is doing with American azaleas through which he expects to perfect a race of horticultural azaleas comparable to the Ghent Azaleas. Here, at New