Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 161 · DO #4210 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF48_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Wiener–Woytkowski, 1948–1957
Digital Object
DO #4210, page 161
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 161 ↗

Page transcription

I hope that you will appreciate that in the above very frank advice
I am only trying to be of service to you. Now, to another, perhaps more
pleasant subject.

I am preparing a second edition of my book "Plant Hunters in the Andes."
It originally appeared in 1941 and a very bad Spanish translation was
published in Buenos Aires some years later as "Cazadores de Plantas en los
Andes." There was, also, a reprint published in London in 1950. Perhaps
you have seen the Spanish translation; if not, I think you could find
it in a Lima library.

During the various periods when you collected for me you wrote me letters
containing some interesting accounts of your experiences. Unfortunately,
I cannot, at the moment, find all these letters.

Would you be interested in writing something for me about your efforts
to get Cattleya Rex in the Moyobamba area, your collecting in Dept.
Huanuco, from Tingo Maria to Pucalpa and in other regions where you
have collected? I would use what you would write plus field notes and
other information in revising or adding to the Peruvian section of my
book.

If you have read the book you know that I combine travel experiences and
general description of places and people with botanical information so
that the tourist gets a picture of an area and the botanist gets material
of value to him concerning its vegetation. That would be the type of
thing that perhaps you could write for me -- colorful descriptions of
life in the montana; for example, I remember that you once wrote about
hearing at night the screaming of the pit vipers. I might want to quote
from you verbatim giving full credit for the "quotes."

I will, of course, pay you for your cooperation. However, I do not want
you to give up any work for which you are now being paid in order to do
some writing for me. I want you to do it in your spare time. I doubt
whether I can give you more than $150 total because whatever I pay will
be at my personal cost with no chance of reimbursement. I could send
you $50 in advance if that would be important to you.

Let me know your reaction to my proposal. If it is favorable send me a
few pages of the sort of thing you could write so that I could give you
suggestions, if necessary.

With all good wishes,

Cordially,

THG:T