Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 6 · DO #4222 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF62_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Research Proposal: National Science Foundation; Biological and Medical Sciences Division, 1957
Digital Object
DO #4222, page 6
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 6 ↗

Page transcription

ESTIMATED BUDGET ------------------------------ $20,355

SOUTH AMERICA -- September 1, 1957 to March 31, 1958

Salaries
T. H. Goodspeed, Director of project, botanist and collector; pension $496 mo.; project salary, $200 mo. --------------------------------------------- 1,400
W.J.Eyerdam (Seattle, Wash.), botanist and collector; full time, 7 months; on leave without pay; project salary, $300 mo. ---------------------------------- 2,100
A second North American botanist and collector; full time, 7 months; on leave without pay; project salary, $300 mo., ------------------------------------------------- 2,100
total salaries ------------------------------------------------------ 5,600

Maintenance (board and lodging)
W.J.Eyerdam (botanist and collector) 210 days @ $5 ---------------------------------------------------- 1,050
A second North American botanist and collector, 210 days @ $5 ---------------------------------------------------- 1,050
total maintenance --------------------------------------------------- 2,100

Transportation
San Francisco to Chile and return W.J.Eyerdam and a second North American botanist and collector ---- $850 each ------------------------------------------------ 1,700
In South America railway, truck hire, pack trains ------------------------------------------------ 2,000
total transportation -------------------------------------------------- 3,700
Expendable plant collecting equipment ----------------------------------------------------- 300

TOTAL IN SOUTH AMERICA --- 11,700

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY -- April 1, 1958 to June 30, 1959

Salaries
T.H.Goodspeed, Director of project, botanist; pension $496 mo.; project salary (half time), $100 mo. -------------------------------------------------------- 1,500
Technical assistance in handling the collections made in South America Herbarium specimens -- recording, labeling, classifying, naming and distributing -- $4,000 Living material -- propagation and study of --------------------------------------------------------------- 500
TOTAL IN BERKELEY ------------------------------------------------ 6,000

UNIVERSITY OVERHEAD (15%) --------------------------------------------------------- 2,655

TOTAL BUDGET ------------------------------------------------------- 20,355

OTHER SOURCES OF SUPPORT FOR PROJECT
John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship grant to T.H.Goodspeed (Project Director) -------------------------------------------------- $3,000 To provide transportation to South America and return, maintenance in South America, technical assistance in South America