Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 114 · DO #4228 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF68_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Miscellaneous materials, mostly concerning the Gardens and its plantings at University of California, Berkeley, 1938–1953
Digital Object
DO #4228, page 114
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 114 ↗

Page transcription

Jan 1953

My colleague, Dr. Lincoln Constance, is one of the most highly esteemed North American students of plant taxonomy with an enviable record of research accomplishments. He has long been concerned with obtaining South American material of the families in the systematics of which he has become the leading authority and I and my assistants during our numerous South American botanical expeditions have been able to assist him in certain isolated instances. Indeed, the evidence that these small contributions provided has doubtless influenced the formulation of the proposals he outlines in his application and which we have often discussed.

Having long been concerned with advancing knowledge of the composition and distribution of the floras of temperate Western South America and having in preparation a monograph on the phytogeography of Chile I am keenly aware of the significance of the studies Dr. Constance would pursue. They will represent the first attempt by a competent investigator to interpret the relationships and distribution of specific plant groups in terms of those broad outlines of the floristics of Western South America which, up to this time, are the only ones available. Of even greater significance will be the opportunity which his proposals provide to throw light upon intercontinental relationships, a problem which demands the type of definitive data which Dr. Constance would secure.

From every point of view I consider Dr. Constance a most acceptable candidate for the Fellowship.