Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

plant collecting and fieldwork in South America medicinal, culinary, or other traditional uses of plants chromosomes and plant classification early herbals and botanical illustrations botanical institutions exchanging plants, seeds, and specimens microscopy and photomicrography in botanical research How did botanists and gardeners introduce plants from one region to another? grafting, budding, and propagation of tropical fruit crops

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 67 · DO #4232 · 182_Goodspeed_Bx3FF72_r

Collection
Thomas Harper Goodspeed (1887–1966) papers
Item/Folder
Re Nicotiana, 1946–1959
Digital Object
DO #4232, page 67
Collection-level dates
1923–1963
Open PDF at page 67 ↗

Page transcription

REVIWS OF BOOKS

GOODSPEED, T. H., The genus Nicotiana. Origins, relationships and evolution of its species in the light of their distribution, morphology and cytogenetics. Chronica Botanica 16 (1954), 536 p., 50 tables, 118 plates and figs. Waltham, Mass.: The Chronica Botanica Co; Groningen: N.V. Erven P. Noordhoff. $ 12.50.

Parts I to IV document an interpretation (Part V) of the origins, relationships and evolution of the species of a representative genus of flowering plants based upon detailed evidence accumulated during many years of study of their distribution, morphology and cytogenetics. Present distribution of all species of the genus, mapped and interpreted in the light of the geologic history of the Americas, Antarctica and Australasia, is shown to correlate with other fundamental evidence of their phyletic conclusions. A living collection of fifty-six of the sixty recognized species and of numerous varieties and forms has permitted comprehensive studies of comparative morphology and cytology which have contributed significantly to documentation of the author's phyletic conclusions. In the section on cytology karyotypes of all but four species and complete meiotic sequences in representative species and hybrids are illustrated. The living collection has also made possible extensive hybridization involving almost every species. Meiotic chromosome behavior in over two hundred F1 interspecific hybrids, representing intersectional or intersubgeneric, as well as intrasectional combinations, has been analyzed and tabulated and in many cases illustrated. The combined evidence points to evolution of the genus via amphiploidy superimposed upon amphiploidy with introgressive hybridization and chromosome reorganisation contributing largely to genetic differentiation on each successive amphiploid level. The complete evolutionary picture is presented in charts showing the derivation of each of the sixty species. — Part VI (with H-M. WHEELER and P. C. HUTCHISON, Sr. Botanists, Botanical Garden, University of California, Berkeley) is a taxonomic reorganization of the genus.

EUPHYTICA
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF PLANT BREEDING
VOL. 4 No. 3 OCTOBER 1955 p. 197-264

This new edition of Roemer-Rudorf's Handbuch der Pflanzenzuchtung published in 38 monthly issues comprising six volumes, viz. Vol. 1: Principles of plant breeding; Vol. 2: Breeding of cereals and maize; Vol. 3: Breeding of potatoes and root crops; Vol. 4: Breeding of fodder crops; Vol. 5: Breeding of special crops (oleaginous, albuminous and fibrous plants, spices and drugs); Vol. 6: Breeding of fruits, vegetables, viny and forest tree plants.