Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 17 · DO #1219 · 35_Scott_Bx4FFSpechtr

Collection
Arthur Moreland Scott (1888–1963) papers
Item/Folder
"Specht, Ray" (1924–2021), 1951–1959
Digital Object
DO #1219, page 17
Collection-level dates
1953–1963
Open PDF at page 17 ↗

Page transcription

June 2 1958

Cambridge University Press,
32 E. 57th St.
New York 22, N.Y.
Attention Mr. Robert W. Adamson.

Gentlemen,

Thanks for your letter of May 22, addressed to "Professor" A. M. Scott. I must tell you, however, that I am not a Professor, nor am I connected with any educational institution. I am, in fact, a retired Civil Engineer, whose hobby for the last 20 years has been the collection and study of a certain group of microscopic algae known as Desmids. In this I have attained some international reputation, and it is the subject of the paper that I wrote, in collaboration with Prof. G.W.Prescott, of Michigan State University, which will appear in Vol. III of the Reports of the Arnhem Land Expedition, supposed to be published next August.

I think the only library in New Orleans that might purchase a set of the Arnhem Land Reports is the Howard-Tilton Memorial Library, Tulane University, New Orleans 18. The Librarian's name is Dr. Garland S. Taylor, and I suggest that you send him one of your brochures. He does not know me personally, but you may mention my name as one of the authors in Vol. III. I also should like to see the brochure (or brochures if there are several), and if they are in short supply I will return them after perusal.

A couple of years ago Dr. R. L. Specht visited me in New Orleans with his wife and small daughter, and some years before that I had a short talk with Dr. Setzler when he lectured on Arnhem Land at Tulane University.

The botanical volume ought to interest certain members of such Societies as the Botanical Society of America, the American Society of Plant Taxonomists, and my paper would interest some members of the Phycological Society of America, so it would be in order for you to circulate the membership of those Societies. However, most of the specialists in my line will receive reprints from me or from Prescott. I suggest that you send the book for review to the American Inst. of Biological Sciences, and advertise it in the A.I.B.S. Bulletin. The book ought to be in the library of all the large universities in this country, and in particular you might send an announcement to Prof. Jos. Ewen, Dept. of Botany, Tulane University, New Orleans 18., who knows me.

Now, here is a subject on which I hope you will be good enough to give me your views. Many specialists have contributed their work in the various "ologies" to the published Reports, and I expect that many or most of them have salaried positions, like Specht at the Univ. of Adelaide and Setzler at the Smithsonian. On the other hand I did the work in my own time, working at nights and Saturdays and Sundays, and it took me nearly two years to complete the study. Of course I did it without any expectation of a pecuniary reward, simply for my own enjoyment as a hobby. The work is difficult and time-consuming, because desmids are quite invisible to the naked eye and must be studied under the microscope at high magnifications. A drawing must be made of each different kind, magnified anywhere from 500 to 2000 times. Some of them require three drawings showing the front, side and top views, like the front elevation, side elevation, and floor plan of a house. So these minute plants, the smallest of which is about 1/4000 of an inch diameter, must be manipulated, floating in water, into three different