Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 98 · DO #4531 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx6FF19_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Miscellaneous (1 of 2), 1945–1981
Digital Object
DO #4531, page 98
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 98 ↗

Page transcription

6

We must pass rapidly over Aemilius Macer whose poem was first printed in
1477 and first illustrated just after 1490 as shown here ( ) with its
titlepage and with these more or less stylized figures ( ) a few,
however, being much better ( ) Many of them turned up in late editions
of the Hortus Sanitatis ( )

We come now to the great trio of works each of which, in its earliest
edition, was produced in the great printing center of Mainz. The first of
these, the Herbarius Moguntinus, is almost as famous in the history of botanical
publication as the Gutenberg Bible in that of theological publication. The
Missouri Botanical Garden owns one of the few remaining copies of the 'editio
princeps', the genuine first edition. Here ( ) it is in its limp leather,
very probably original, cover, all of it as it was published except its title
page, which was very simple indeed, reading, ( ) as shown in this typed
copy, only: "Herbarius. Ma-|gentie impressus|Anno 7clxxxiiij". Still, it's
too bad not to have it, for this book was one of the earliest to have any title
page at all. Its first leaf looks like this. ( ) Written in Latin it
says that the book is for those poor and needy who cannot afford the expensive
drugs of the apothecaries, but who can learn from it to use native simples.
There are 150 plants discussed, all but five of them native to Germany or at
least at that time cultivated in German gardens. Each one is figured ( )
and given a Latin name and a vernacular name, following which there is a
recital of its properties and virtues. Here we have the lily, cold and moist
in the first degree, it says, and, we might say, looking rather like these
modern Japanese plastic plants in which there is no integral relation between
the leaves and the stem. The iris ( ) hot and dry in the second degree, has
diuretic virtues, and may be used against opilation of the spleen and liver
(provided you can find out what opilation is). By the way, the text here illus-
trates very well the abbreviations used in early printing. These were taken over
directly from the manuscript writers and were freely used to save space and to