Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 122 · DO #4531 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx6FF19_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Miscellaneous (1 of 2), 1945–1981
Digital Object
DO #4531, page 122
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 122 ↗

Page transcription

very rare work of which doubtfully ten copies still exist. Oviedo was
sent by the Spanish crown on several missions to America in the first
third of the century following Columbus' discovery. He travelled ex-
tensively in the West Indies, Mexico and South America, and, as an eye-
witness, reports many novel observations.

Notable among the books selected for their illustrations was the so-
called Latin Herbarius, printed in Mainz by Peter Schoeffer in 1484. It
is the second printed botanical book containing illustrations; each plant
is represented by a figure so stylized in most cases as to make identifi-
cation almost impossible without the accompanying text and the Latin and
German names by which it was known. Beside this book was placed Brunfels
Herbarum vivae eicones [Pictures of living plants] of 1530. This is the
first printed botanical work to be illustrated wholly by drawings made
from living plants; the artist, Hans Weiditz, did so well that in almost
every instance the identity of the plant represented is certain to one
who knows it in nature.

The great Swedish scientist, Linnaeus (1707-1778), was first of all
a botanist, although in his efforts to systematize the natural world he
had to treat both minerals and animals as well as plants. But the bulk
of his writings are on botany, and of these the Garden has a very excel-
lent collection. Among the books in the exhibit was the first edition of
his Systema naturae (1735); here, on twelve large broadside pages he
displays in systematic order all of the larger groups of the three king-
doms of nature; mineral, vegetable and animal. He spent a large part of
his life elaborating this system, and present-day taxonomists are still
at work on it. Other works shown were first edition copies of his Genera
plantarum (1737) and his Species plantarum (1753). In the latter, surely