Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 155 · DO #4532 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx6FF20_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Miscellaneous (2 of 2), 1945–1981
Digital Object
DO #4532, page 155
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 155 ↗

Page transcription

-2-

Now comes the bad part. As I told you, Barbara plans to use for next year's Bulletin as covers only illustrations out of Schöffer's Latin Herbarius and asked me to write an article about him and it for the March-April Bulletin, since the January-February Bulletin will be entirely devoted to fund raising and just has an illustration out of the Herbarius on its cover, with just the name of the plant given, but no further description. I have read everything I could get hold off about the Herbarius (at least, I believe so) and find it entirely impossible not to repeat the things written by Agnes Arber about this work and by other authors. I also found that Arber copied almost word by word from Payne's paper on "The Herbarius" read before the Bibliographical Society. Since I found no evidence that this was copyrighted, I intend to use part of what he wrote.

He and Arber (probably copying from him) say that the plants in the Herbarius are all German native or garden plants, you also wrote me that it contains only German plants. It is true that the names are given in German as well as Latin, but Payne as well as Arber also mention that this work was probably printed from a manuscript Peter Schöffer found somewhere, that most of it was probably written hundred years before it was printed. He also wrote that it is a compilation from mediaeval writers, with some classical and Arabian authors. Why would an Arabian author write about German plants? In his History of Botany recently published, George H. M. Lawrence writes: "Two groups of incunabula followed, each passing through several editions or reprints (usually pirated). The first was the Latin Herbarius, or Ortus Sanitatis meaning (Garden of Health), and the second was the German Herbarius, or Gart der Gesundheit, also meaning "Garden of Health". The first edition of Ortus Sanitatis, an abundantly illustrated work, was printed in 1484 by Peter Schöffer of Mainz. Its text is in Latin.