Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 149 · DO #4538 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx7FF6_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Correspondence N–Z (2 of 2), 1944–1973
Digital Object
DO #4538, page 149
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 149 ↗

Page transcription

- 3 -

about a course, "The selection and use of plant materials in public
and private landscaping, designed for civil engineers"?

I regret that I did not attend the Garden's symposium held last
fall. Sponsorship of such worthwhile projects certainly ought to add
to the prestige of the institution. It seems to me that there is need
for a getting together of the heads and many of the workers in our
larger herbaria for discussion of problems common to all of them, the
botanical gardens too. You referred to the fact that at the September
meetings in East Lansing there was some such meeting. There was, but
it was on a very limited scale. I wonder if some institution would
find it personally advantageous to sponsor such a convention.

The herbarium was of course one of the Garden's facilities that
had an especial appeal to me. I had little contact with it on this
visit, but my impression was that it is definitely on the mend,
thanks mostly to you. The improvements are long overdue. The space
consideration is indeed a limiting factor. My little suggestion for
putting certain cases on wheels so they could be moved aside in order
to get operating space would have limited benefits. The Garden's
program to dispose of collections not in active use seems the only
way out, especially if it will strengthen the use of the remaining
collections. I hope that whoever acquires them will stimulate work
in those fields so that the over-all result will be an increase in
scientific research. I hope I may some day again have the pleasure
of working on the M.B.G. herbarium collections in connection with my
planned research. In this regard let me mention the great advantage
that the Garden has over institutions without garden facilities. Where
can those doing taxonomic research at the U.S. National Herbarium grow
material to supplement their herbarium studies? Are these opportunities
being exploited at the Garden to their full potentialities? I trust
that they are.

The library and the herbarium are inseparable. As with the
herbarium I was much impressed with the recent improvements you have
carried out; they were evident everywhere, no less in the minds of
those intimately associated with the library--and not always on the
approving side. But that only emphasized their value in my mind.
However, the library, like the auditorium, seemed to me to be in
urgent need of more adequate quarters. The atmosphere was dingy.
Redecorating and modern lighting would do wonders. I suppose reading
room space has been sacrificed over the ages to the increased collec-
tions and the need for working space for students. I wonder if there
was ever any appreciable use made of the library by the botanical
public, directly by personal use or through requests for information.
It seems, under the present circumstances, that outsiders could hardly
benefit greatly from the library, and yet that might be one of the ways
to build up the reputation of the institution as a developmental force
in the city, leading indirectly to new financial support. Do the