Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 4 · DO #454 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF24r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Tropical Fruits - notes, manuscript pages - chapter in outline for proposed book with Herbert Wolfe, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #454, page 4
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 4 ↗

Page transcription

3
horticulturists have depended largely upon imported stock. Little
material was available locally, and there was a lack of confidence
on the part of buyers. This situation is changing, and one of the
major purposes of this book is to assist nurserymen regarding best
methods of propagation, the choice of varieties of each fruit and the
exercise of great care in labelling. As regards commercial
fruits, it must be remembered that new varieties come onto the market
from time to time. This is especially true of fruits which
are relatively new, so far as commercial cultivation is concerned. The
planter should pay utmost attention to this subject before he lays
out his orchard.

The selection of land for orchard planting is another matter of great importance. Many tropical horticulturists do not
realise the importance of soil texture, and depth of soil; good drainage; and irrigation; and the need of fertilizers. These
subjects are treated in the Introduction to this book; the tropical
horticulturist is urged to give them the study they merit.

Pruning is often neglected, especially in the first few years
of the life of the tree. In other instances it is overdone, largely
because insufficient experience has not been accumulated in connection
with the culture of numerous fruits.

This book is based largely upon work done during the past
25 years at Lancetilla Experiment Station and the Escuela Agricola
Panamericana in Honduras; and upon work at the Subtropical Experiment
Station of the University of Florida at Homestead, and the several
plants' Introduction Gardens of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in southern Florida. Lancetilla,
which was founded in 1925 by the United Fruit Company, has the
largest collection of tropical fruits in America, so far as
species are concerned; the Subtropical Experiment Station at Home-