Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 39 · DO #459 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF29r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Preface, Introduction, and The Mango - manuscript and notes (typed and handwritten) - chapters in outline for proposed book with Herbert Wolfe, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #459, page 39
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 39 ↗

Page transcription

1956 TRIBUTE TO FLORIDA 311

George B. Cellon of Miami, which was then "at the end of the line", was the first to propagate commercially mango and avocado varieties by grafting. He used the method known as shield budding, and he concentrated upon the Mulgoba mango and two avocado varieties which he had selected among the numerous seedlings growing in the Miami region—these were Trapp and Pollock. Cellon had moved south from his home in northern Florida. He was a true plantsman and a most picturesque character.

At about the same time, or a few years later, John B. Beach established a nursery at West Palm Beach, whence he sold budded trees of mangoes and avocados. I recall that when I first visited him he was experimenting with a new method of grafting avocados something on the order of the herbaceous cleft, as we call it today. This is the first time I remember seeing very young rootstocks used, a common practice today.

In the early years of the present century, the United States Department of Agriculture established a "Plant Introduction Garden" at Miami, a tiny tract of only seven acres or so which was destined to play a major role in the development of tropical horticulture. I believe P. H. Rolfs, for many years Dean of the College of Agriculture at the University of Florida, played an active part in this; and then, for some years, P. J. Wester was in charge. I recall Dean Rolfs telling me that he had found Wester at the Royal Palm Hotel in Miami, where he was head gardener, and had recognized in him those qualities of the true plantsman which peculiarly fitted him for work at the new station. Wester later moved to the Philippines, where for years he was active in the work of plant introduction and propagation. He published many bulletins and papers, one of which, on the vegetative propagation of tropical fruits, is practically a classic, for he had succeeded in budding many species which had previously been grown only from seeds. Many of these species are still not commonly propagated by any other means.

Wester was succeeded by Edward Simmonds, who was for years assisted by Charles H. Steffani, recently retired as County Agent at Homestead. Simmonds had not been trained as a plantsman but he was born a plantsman. I remember his telling me how it happened that he got into the field of