Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 12 · DO #4603 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx9FF28_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Ewan Biography, undated
Digital Object
DO #4603, page 12
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 12 ↗

Page transcription

The Travels, published in 1791, were illustrated with drawings by William Bartram himself. If judged on the basis of these drawings, William would hardly merit mention in the annals of botanical illustration. Wilfrid Blunt, in his The art of botanical illustration, mentions Bartram only incidentally. The present publication of the Fothergill albums of Bartram drawings, however, makes it clear that even though Bartram does not rank with Ehret, the Bauers or Redouté, he may be regarded as an artist of high distinction with several surprisingly beautiful botanical and zoological illustrations to his credit. Bartram's famous drawing of Franklinia alatamaha (1788), featured on the frontispiece, and the picture of the Green Heron (pl. 44) represent indeed, as Ewan points out, the apogee of his artistry. A comparison between the 'Amona (Asimina obovata)' in the Travels with that in the Fothergill album (pl. 45, fig. 1) explains the discrepancy in the evaluation of William Bartram's artistic accomplishment. The picture in the Travels is flat and crude, even when the loss of detail through engraving and reproduction is taken into account; that in the Fothergill album is sensitive and very much alive. The Bartram Asiminas are an interesting example of the extent of his botanical discoveries: he encountered five then undescribed species on his journeys. Two are illustrated in the Travels: A. secundiflora (erroneously named 'Anona pygmea' on the plate) and 'Anona grandiflora', now correctly named (fide Ewan) Asimina obovata.

The drawing of Franklinia, perhaps the finest of the whole collection, was originally made for the English amateur botanist Robert Barclay, but it is now also preserved in the Fothergill album. The plant is also illustrated very nicely on plate 23 of the album itself. Ewan, in his extensive commentary, uses the opportunity to correct some misconceptions persistent in the literature. Franklinia was discovered by the Bartrams together on 1 October 1765; the last mention of it in the literature is by John Lyon, who saw '6 to 8 full grown trees' on 1 June 1803. 'Almost everything about Franklinia is fabulous...' It is fortunate that the Bartram garden kept the germ plasm of this beautiful relict genus alive, thus preserving for posterity an example of a botanical Sino-American alliance. Ewan's text does ample justice to William Bartram, as well as to his drawings. The great scholarship of the doyen of historians of American botany accounts for an unusually well-documented and detailed account of Bartram's life and for an exhaustive commentary on the plates and accompanying manuscripts. The introduction contains biographical chapters, evaluating Bartram as a naturalist, artist and explorer. The detailed biographical data are brought together in a chronology entitled The world of William Bartram which, notwithstanding its dryly enumerative style, presents a fascinating account of early American botany and of the relations between the botanists in the motherland and those overseas in colonial times.

In his discussion of the plates themselves Ewan provides taxonomic and historical information, often quoting from unpublished sources and giving details on nomenclature, literature, typification and herbarium specimens. This part of the book is of direct relevance for taxonomy. Ewan accepts, with Merrill, the validity of William Bartram's binomials as published in the Travels, a position amply justified by the quotations from published as well as unpublished material. The Appendix contains extracts from the manuscripts which accompanied the illustrations and specimens sent to Fothergill and Barclay. These comments often contain interesting side remarks on dates of first collection or introduction of now widely known plants. Ilicium floridanum, for instance, was collected first by Bartram in northern Florida in the winter of 1766, nine years earlier than the date quoted by the author of the name, John Ellis. Bartram referred to the plant as 'Anisum stellatum'; plate 3 of the present book is the earliest known drawing of the plant, the flowers of which inspired the editor of this journal in his choice of this year's cover.

All plates of the reproductions reached by repro chronological order Fothergill volume One further item 250 items. This bi manuscript, the b together with this artistry, in an' in This is undoubtedly cal illustration, William Bartram.

WILD FLOWERS

Frans A. Stafleu

Theophrastus (c ing of scientific plants had been features. The stud other natural sci centuries later G Theophrastus, bu medica dominated during the Byzant bonensis) of the s there were numer ginal scientific bo many centuries. Renewed study Britain and Gree recounted the sto Bauer, and the n landris, Goulimis earlier classic. Th may follow) can s with that greatest Greek botany Many British Bot.

• Wild Flowers of edited by W. T. S Kifissia, Athens, Gr (prepublication) US