Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 13 · DO #4603 · 116_Van%20Schaack_Bx9FF28_r

Collection
George B. Van Schaack (1903–1983) papers
Item/Folder
Ewan Biography, undated
Digital Object
DO #4603, page 13
Collection-level dates
1918–1981
Open PDF at page 13 ↗

Page transcription

All plates of the Fothergill album are reproduced in Ewan's book. The quality of the reproductions (by Meriden Gravure) is very high; a special effect has been reached by reproducing the full sheets in a grey cadre. The plates are reproduced in chronological order; a cross index to the numbers of the original drawings in the Fothergill volume is provided.

One further item merits special mention: the very extensive bibliography of nearly 250 items. This bibliography, the chronology, the analyses of the plates, the annotated manuscript, the biographical and iconographical chapters by Ewan are presented together with this fine series of sixty botanical and zoological drawings of no mean artistry, in an imposing volume of refined typography and delicate reproduction. This is undoubtedly the finest tribute so far paid to that pioneer of American botanical illustration, botanist, explorer and connoisseur of the American landscape, William Bartram.


WILD FLOWERS OF GREECE *

Frans A. Stafleu

Theophrastus (c. 370–285 B.C.) and his De Historia plantarum stand at the beginning of scientific botany. Botany was born with ancient Greek culture; previously plants had been studied only for their medicinal, economic or supposedly magical features. The study of plants for the sake of knowledge as such originated, with the other natural sciences, in the spiritual climate of Aristotle and Theophrastus. Four centuries later Greece yielded another botanist, of lesser scientific standing than Theophrastus, but for centuries of greater fame, Dioscorides, whose De Materia medica dominated Western botany for nearly sixteen centuries. Greek botany eclipsed during the Byzantine Empire. The Juliana Anicia Codex of Dioscorides (Codex vindobonensis) of the sixth century stands out as a monument of botanical illustration, and there were numerous recipe books, glossaries and other compilations; however, original scientific botanical research remained at low ebb in Theophrastus' country for many centuries.

Renewed study of the Greek flora arose from a 'special relationship' between Great Britain and Greece. Only a few years ago, in this journal (16: 168–178), Stearn recounted the story of John Sibthorp, John Edward Smith, John Lindley, Ferdinand Bauer, and the magnificent Flora Graeca. Anyone who opens the volume by Goulandris, Goulimis and Stearn will immediately associate its beauty with that of the earlier classic. This new volume of colour illustrations of Greek wild flowers (others may follow) can stand a comparison, not in size but in quality and general execution, with that greatest of all illustrated floras, the Flora Graeca.

Greek botany remained a non-Greek affair long after Sibthorp and Smith's time. Many British botanists and horticulturists were attracted by the riches of the Greek


* Wild Flowers of Greece, painted by Niki A. Goulandris, text by Constantine N. Goulimis, edited by W. T. Stearn. Publication of the Goulandris Botanical Museum [5, Levidou St.,] Kifissia, Athens, Greece. 1968. 214 pp., 119 coloured plates, linen bound, 38 x 28 cm. Price (prepublication) US $ 40.–

VOLUME 18
AUGUST 1969
445