Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 67 · DO #461 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF31r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
The Cherimoya - manuscripts in Spanish & English , notes and correspondence - chapter in outline for proposed book with Herbert Wolfe, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #461, page 67
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 67 ↗

Page transcription

5.
with U-shaped areoles resembling finger-prints in wax; forma laevis,
in which the surface is quite smooth; forma tuberculata, with wart-like
tubercles near the apex of each areole; forma mamillata, the name of
which adequately describes it; and forma umbonata, in which the surface
is studded with conical protuberances. This classification is of
interest as showing the range of surface characteristics, but horticulturists
have never paid much attention to it when selecting seedlings for
vegetative propagation. Safford considered that a certain degree of
correlation existed between these forms and flavor and quality of fruit.
It appears that the few named varieties which are grown today in Australia
in California, in Spain and perhaps one or two other regions have
been selected for quality more than any other factor, though size of
fruit, appearance, and most of all productiveness, have sometimes
been given consideration. The fact of the matter is, no well-organized
work of cherimoya improvement has been carried out. Hand-pollination
will increase production but commercially has not been found very satisfactory.

Cherimoyas are easily grown from seeds, which may be kept for a
year if well-dried. In those regions where this fruit has become an
orchard crop, seedling trees which were considered superior have been
propagated vegetatively. This has usually been done on rootstocks of
the same species, though it is thought in tropical America that
Annona reticulata might be preferable in some places because of its
resistance to drought and poor soils. Seedlings to be budded should
be 1 to 1.5 cms. in diameter at the base, and buds should be cut larger
than for citrus.

The development of veneer (sometimes called side-veneer) grafting
has brought about a revolution in the propagation of many tropical
fruit trees. In Florida and in tropical America veneer grafting has