Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 19 · DO #466 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF36r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
The Nut Fruits, Miscellaneous Fruits - manuscripts, notes, correspondence - chapter in outline for proposed book with Herbert Wolfe, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #466, page 19
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 19 ↗

Page transcription

5
of the hull causes it to shrink and eventually to split lengthwise at some point.
Further shrinkage often follows until it covers only a small portion of the nut
surface, and the nut falls to the ground. Within the tough, moderately thick
shell is a round white kernel of delicious taste, either fresh or roasted. It
constitutes about 30 to 40% by weight of the whole nut and contains from 60 to
80% oil and 8 to 10% protein. The nuts are very difficult to crack by hand
without mashing the kernel, but special machinery has been developed to handle
this problem commercially.

The smooth-shelled species, M. integrifolia, above described is the one
grown almost exclusively in Hawaii and California. Unfortunately, the botanical
name has been changed in recent years. Formerly it was called M. ternifolia
var. integrifolia. A very close species, M. tetraphylla, is called the rough-
shelled macadamia because its nuts, broadly elliptical rather than round, have
slightly bumpy surfaces. This species is distinguished, as the botanical indicates,
by having normally 4 leaves at each node; the leaves being longer than in
M. integrifolia and heavily spiny along the margins. There is a blooming period
in spring only. The nuts are as large as, or larger than, those of the smooth-
shelled type but are considered less satisfactory for processing in Hawaii, in
part because of thicker shells. In Australia the rough-shelled species is more
grown than the other.

A number of named varieties have been selected and propagated in Hawaii,
and these are being tested in California and Florida. Selection was made for
yield primarily, but also for nuts of fairly large average size and thinner than
average shells. Clonal varieties are being grown in Australia, also. Grafted
trees of the best adapted varieties usually have yields 3 to 5 times the average
as many
Propagation may be done by either side-for veneer-grafting on seedling stocks.
Seeds should be less than 4 months old for good viability. It is best to plant them