Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 45 · DO #466 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF36r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
The Nut Fruits, Miscellaneous Fruits - manuscripts, notes, correspondence - chapter in outline for proposed book with Herbert Wolfe, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #466, page 45
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 45 ↗

Page transcription

13
The evergreen tree is of medium size, 25 to 40 ft. high, and spreading in habit.
Leaves are alternate and palmately-compound, with 5 leaflets usually, each 3 to
5 in. long. Flowers are inconspicuous, greenish-yellow in color, borne in small
clusters on old twigs before the new growth flush. Some 4 or 5 months later the
fruits mature. They are greenish-yellow, from 1-1/2 to 3 in. across, somewhat
flattened or nearly round. Under a very thin, delicate skin is a soft, melting
flesh, ranging in color from white with flecks of yellow to golden yellow, with
slightly gritty texture like pears. There are 1 to 5 large seeds, each with a
thin, white, fibrous covering which is the "stone". The sugar content of the
flesh is high, 12 to 20%, and the acidity very low, so that the taste is very
sweet; commonly it is also slightly bitter, like quinine, especially if the fruit
is picked before the first yellowing. Seedlings differ much in the size and also
the bitter aftertaste, and some produce very palatable fruit.

Another form of white-sapote occurs from Yucatan to Costa Rica and is dis-
tinguished by pubescence on the lower leaf surfaces and by much larger fruits,
to 4 in. diameter. The name C. tetrameria is in the literature, but it seems
very doubtful that this is a distinct species; rather it is probably a mutant,
polyploid form of C. edulis. The only common name which is distinctive is woolly-
leaved white-sapote. Fruit characters, except size, are identical in the two
forms. Both are eaten out of hand principally.

Propagation is commonly by seeds, which germinate in 2 weeks and only retain
viability for a month or so. Superior seedlings may easily be grafted on seedling
stocks using whip- or veneer-grafting. Buds unite easily but are difficult to
start into growth. Seedling trees take 7 or 8 years to bear, whereas grafted
trees should bear in 3 or 4 years.

As a highland tree, the white-sapote thrives in the tropics only at elevations
of 3000 to 6000 ft., although in the subtropics it grows well at sea level. The
tree tolerates almost as much cold as the orange. It seems better adapted to semi-
arid than humid climates, but needs irrigation in long, dry periods. Any well-
drained soil seems satisfactory.