Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

plant collecting and fieldwork in South America medicinal, culinary, or other traditional uses of plants chromosomes and plant classification early herbals and botanical illustrations botanical institutions exchanging plants, seeds, and specimens microscopy and photomicrography in botanical research How did botanists and gardeners introduce plants from one region to another? grafting, budding, and propagation of tropical fruit crops

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 141 · DO #4708 · 231_Rogers_Bx3FF31_r

Collection
David James Rogers (1918–2007) papers
Item/Folder
Graduate Students Garrido, Johnston, McArthur & McCarthy, 1974–1979
Digital Object
DO #4708, page 141
Collection-level dates
1948–1977
Open PDF at page 141 ↗

Page transcription

& ____ (1972). Plant age and chromatographic pattern in Potentilla. Hereditas 72:149-152.

P. argentea, canescens, & norvegica: TLC on leaves of plants grown in growth chambers at different ages (in months). Showed only moderate influence of age on chromatographic pattern, more quantitative (intensities). Greatest differences in early stages of growth (up to 3 months).

Bate-Smith, E.C. (1962). Chromatography and taxonomy in the Rosaceae, with special reference to Potentilla and Prunus. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 58:39-54.

Argentina is distinctive, with myricetin & leucodelphin, from rest of family. There are chemicals distinguishing Wolf's Trichocarpae from Gymnocarpace; and also Graciles from other groups. Many species seem to have one or more constituents characterizing them.

Borhidi, A. & Isepy, I. (1966). Statistical studies on Potentilla species. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 12:221-239.

P. thyrsiflora, related to P. collina; statistics of leaf pubescence, size, leaflet teeth and their sizes; in species complex. Discrimination analysis allowed P. leucopolitanoides to be separated definitely from P. leucopolitana but not from P. thyrsiflora.

Britikov, I.A. & Musatova, N.A. (1973). (Modelling of the stimulating effects of pollen during parthenogenesis of Potentilla argentea L.: effectiveness of proline). Fiziolog. Rast. 20:557-562. Translated as: Soviet Plant Physiology.

Several chemicals induced seed-set greater than water control, but in every case, pollinated flowers set much greater seed than either. Of these chemicals, proline and the enzymes papain and amylase had the most striking inducement effect. Casein hydrolyzate, ATP, and arginine had significant effect. Plant growth substances, nucleotides, RNase, coconut milk, and glutamic acid all had no effect.

Chaika, V.M., Sobolevskaya, K.A., & Minayeva, V.G. (1973). K chyemosistematike roda Potentilla L. Izv. Sibir. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR ser. Biol. Nauk 2:31-36.

13 species of Potentilla of SE Altai Mts.: 4-7 flavenoids by paper chromatography. Limited study, but these may be useful to distinguish genera: Comarum, Potentilla s.str., Argentina.

Challice, J.S. (1974). Rosaceae chemotaxonomy and the origins of the Pomoideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 69:239-259.

Leaf samples from 197 species, using paper chromatography. Only one Potentilla species used. Discussion of phylogeny of subfamilies, particularly v/v Pomoideae.

Christoff, M. & Papasova, G. (1943). Die genetischen Grundlagen der apomiktischen Fortpflanzung in der Gattung Potentilla. Zeitschr. Vererbungsl. 81:1-27.

220 crosses attempted, mostly among species of Potentilla s.str.; 24 species crossed in all; 15 hybrid progenies obtained. All sexual x sexual crosses had sterile F1s; most fertile F1s yielded high proportion of maternal F2.

Clausen, J., Keck, D.D., & Hiesey, W.M. (1940). Experimental studies on the nature of species I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 520:1-452.

Drymocallis glandulosa, pp. 26-124: taxonomic review, transplant studies, discussion; ecotypes formed all at diploid level. Potentilla gracilis complex, pp. 125-175: taxonomic revision, very high chromosome numbers and some aneuploids, transplant studies, discussion. P. drummondii and P. breweri,