Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 57 · DO #4767 · 231_Rogers_Bx5FF17_r

Collection
David James Rogers (1918–2007) papers
Item/Folder
GRC Meeting Turrialba, 1973
Digital Object
DO #4767, page 57
Collection-level dates
1948–1977
Open PDF at page 57 ↗

Page transcription

THE MAINTENANCE OF LIVING PLANT COLLECTIONS*
Paul K. Soderholm
Plant Introduction Station
Miami, Florida, U.S.A.

HISTORY

The Subtropical Horticulture Research Unit of the Agricultural
Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, formerly known as
the U.S. Plant Introduction Station of Miami, has been engaged in intro-
ducing and maintaining living plant materials (germplasm) for 75 years.
In 1898 the Department rented seven acres of land in the area that is now
downtown Miami. In a few years the site became inadequate to contain
the flood of plant "immigrants", as they were called at that time, and a
new 25-acre site was chosen. This too, became crowded before long
and in 1923 the present site was opened on what had been a U.S. Army
airfield during World War I. This site was chosen by Dr. David Fairchild,
a well-known horticulturist and plant explorer, because of the location on
the ocean. Temperatures here were generally 5° to 10°F (3° to 6°C)
warmer than inland, a factor which he recognized could mean the difference
between saving and losing some of the more tender tropical plants. Indeed,
his reasoning was well founded for over the years there have been times
during severe winters when the Hevea, Theobroma and other more
tropical germplasm approached the threshold of their tolerance to chilling,
but always survived.

As first conceived, the object was not so much to amass a collection
of plants per se, but to distribute them to any citizen who was willing to
try new species. By this means it was hoped that the new plants would
become established and eventually find their place in agriculture, industry,
or home landscaping. As each introduction was grown in the Station's
facilities, a plant or two was put in the field forming a nucleus of plant
germplasm that finally developed into the collection of about 3,000 intro-
ductions that are not being maintained. About 23,000 accessions have
been received in the 50 years at our present location.

PHYSICAL PLANT

We have four greenhouses with a total of 7,000 square feet under
glass, a lath covered area of 8,000 square feet, a work building of "head"
structure as we call it, laboratory, and an office and records building.

* Internal document: Not for general distribution.