Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 4 · DO #479 · 204_Popenoe_Bx33FF49r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Fruits - English & Spanish manuscripts, typed and handwritten, notes, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #479, page 4
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 4 ↗

Page transcription

3
HOTEL AVILA
CARACAS
VENEZUELA

CARTER L. GARDNER
MANAGER

Mangos. Advances in vegetative propagation and in the development of profitable commercial varieties have been notable, though we still have a lot to do, probably, in connection with this last point. Haden is not doing too badly as yet in the tropics. I want to mention Mulgoba and Pairi and Amini and Sandersha of the Indian group, and Cambodiana and the Filipino or Manila seedlings of what I still like to call the Philippine group, though some folks don't agree with me. And the newer Florida varieties. And Julie.

Avocados. Good work has been done on grafting, the techniques not being the same everywhere. The work in Florida outstanding, because it seems to apply well to the tropics. Too many varieties in California, too many "cats and dogs". Main cultural problem is the root disease - look for sandy or calcareous soils, but even if the latter they must have good drainage, e.g. Almuñecar.

Grapes. Growing interest in the American hybrids with some but not too much vinifera blood Experience throughout the pure tropics with the Viniferas. Niagara, Isabella, Golden Muscat. And others.

Annonas. Not much to be said. The pollination problem - seems to be a local matter to a large degree. The cherimoya x squamosa hybrids look pretty good in some regions, especially Israel. Guanabana is a real and attractive problem. Make it produce more fruit.

Lychees. Experience to date rather discouraging in most tropical regions and we hear this is true of Florida also. Undercut production. But this a new fruit with us and surely deserves lots of investigation.

Pejibaye. Could well be grown to produce a lot of nutritious food in moist tropical areas. Varieties can be propagated by suckers like date palms, but slowly, it seems.

The Rosaceous Fruits. Climatic problems and varieties Peaches (lowest elevations), Plums, Pears and Apples. The Tanaka loquat - what it has done in Guatemala and southern Spain. The berries - especially