Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 3 · DO #1265 · 53_Arber_Box4FF1r

Collection
Agnes Robertson Arber (1879–1960) papers
Item/Folder
Articles and notes for articles -- Ar [1], 2–5, 7–19, 1927–1958
Digital Object
DO #1265, page 3
Collection-level dates
1886–1985
Open PDF at page 3 ↗

Page transcription

2
herbals of the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries. This plant was chosen
for special illustration because, after an early period in which its
healing powers were held in high esteem, it passed through a time
when its use was obsolete except in folk medicine, but it has now been
reinstated and has received medical and scientific recognition.

A study dealing with a more specialised theme is B.
Hryniewiecki's account of Anton Schneeberger (1530 - 1581) ein Schüler
Konrad Gesners in Polen (Veröffentlichungen des Geobot. Inst., Rübel in
Zürich. 13, 1938). Schneeberger belonged to a Bavarian family settled in
Zürich, but he himself spent most of his life in Poland. He compiled a
Catalogus Stirpium ... Latine et Polonice conscriptus. Krakau, 1557,
in which he identified the plants of Poland, and added the names in the
Polish vernacular. This little book, which is now an extreme rarity,
is the first of its kind dealing with the botany of Poland. It includes
432 plant names, of which 270 are wild Polish plants.
also falls under the heading of eighteenth-century Botany
A note on Hyoscyamus luteus, by R.F.Ockenden (Isis, 30: 273, 1939).
A certain plant described by Dodens as
Hyoscyamus luteus has been identified as Nicotiana rustica. This brief
paper reviews the evidence for and against this identification, and
concludes that it is doubtful.

A general work of another kind, the interest of which is
horticultural and archaeological as well as botanical, is S. Tolkowsky's
Hesperides. A History of the Culture and Use of citrus Fruits (London,
1938). This very fully illustrated and documented monograph gives the
history of the migrations of the orange, citron, lemon, lime, shaddock,
and grape fruit, from their original home in S.E.Asia. The evidence
drawn from representations of these fruits in pictures and other works of
art is shown to be particularly useful, since it avoids the uncertainties
as to the exact meaning of the names used at different periods, which
often minimise the value of references in literature.