Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 59 · DO #1265 · 53_Arber_Box4FF1r

Collection
Agnes Robertson Arber (1879–1960) papers
Item/Folder
Articles and notes for articles -- Ar [1], 2–5, 7–19, 1927–1958
Digital Object
DO #1265, page 59
Collection-level dates
1886–1985
Open PDF at page 59 ↗

Page transcription

2
corollas turn brown on drying has been met by replacing them by imitations cut out of larkspur flowers! There are a number of inscriptions on the sheets, and all the information which can possibly be gleaned from these has been brought together and analysed by Dr. Rytz, who has also made a profound study of the paper used for mounting - a study which reveals no less than forty different watermarks. All this research leads directly to the conclusion that the collection was formed in the second half of the sixteenth century by some botanist who was in relation with Charles de l'Écluse(1525-1607) and Joachim Camerarius (1534-1598), from whom he received specimens. After a process of delicate detective work, too complex and detailed to be summarised here, Dr. Rytz decides that the herbarium was undoubtedly collected by Felix Platter, an eminent physician of Basle, who lived from 1556 to 1614. Fortunately the facts of Platter's life have been fully recorded and a contemporary portrait was available for reproduction.

From 1552 to 1557 he is known to have studied medicine at Montpellier, like so many botanists of his day - for instance Conrad Gesner, Jacques Palaichamps, Charles de l'Écluse, Jean Bauhin, Pierre Pena and Jean de l'Obel. In his diary of 1554 Platter speaks of collecting "viler kreuter, die ich in papier zierlich inmacht", so it is clear that he had already begun a herbarium soon after the middle of the sixteenth century. Dr. Rytz believes that all European herbaria can be traced back to the influence of Luca Ghini, from whom the "Father of British Botany", William Turner, learned to dry plants. Rondelet, Felix Platter's teacher at Montpellier, was also probably taught the art of herbarium-making by Ghini, and disseminated it among his pupils. The interchange of dried plants between savants played a very important part in the beginning of scientific systematics, and illustrations often seem to have been drawn from them. This is shown by the fact that in August 1563 Conrad Gesner wrote to Johannes Bauhin, "At this time I cannot occupy the artist with dried plants: he can scarcely now paint all the fresh and living examples: I put off the dried specimens to the winter, when there will be no opportunity of getting living ones". The oldest herbaria usually consisted