Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 60 · DO #1265 · 53_Arber_Box4FF1r

Collection
Agnes Robertson Arber (1879–1960) papers
Item/Folder
Articles and notes for articles -- Ar [1], 2–5, 7–19, 1927–1958
Digital Object
DO #1265, page 60
Collection-level dates
1886–1985
Open PDF at page 60 ↗

Page transcription

3
of dried plants alone, but the collections of Gaspard Bauhin and Felix Platter are exceptions in including figures as well as actual specimens. In the Platter herbarium there are 650 woodcuts; most of them are from well known herbals of the period, but there is also a rough but specially interesting set of pictures, which appear to be proofs taken from the blocks prepared by Leonhard Fuchs for a new edition of his herbal, which was destined to remain unpublished.

Felix Platter did not confine himself to botany: he was an enthusiastic collector of natural and artistic treasures of all kinds, and foreigners were accustomed to visit his "cabinet" for instruction and entertainment. Those in whose lives Michel, Sieur de Montaigne, plays a part, must feel a glow of pleasure in realising that it was Platter's herbarium which was examined with admiration by Montaigne when he passed through Basle in 1580 on his way to Italy. An herbarium was evidently a new toy to him. He writes of "un livre de simples... au lieu que les autres font peindre les herbes selon leurs couleurs, lui a trouvé l'art de les coller toutes naturelles et proprement sur le papier." He notes with surprise that the pages could be turned over without the plants dropping out, and that some of them were actually more than twenty years old.

The ninth folio, which contains illustrations alone, seems to be the last survivor out of a set of similar volumes, of which no less than twenty-three have been lost. Perhaps this rare treasure trove will reward future search. The surviving volume includes 667 woodcuts, mostly derived from printed herbals, and a few copperplate etchings. There are also watercolour drawings, which are of peculiar interest, since they include a number which Dr. Rytz recognised at once as corresponding closely to the woodcuts by Hans Weiditz in the great Herbarum Vivae Icones of Otto Brunfels (1530) - a book which marks the beginning of a new era in plant illustration, and which has been elected for its handstand position by the authoritative work of D.T. A. Prague of the New Herbarium (Jour. Bot., Bot. Soc., Bot.), vol. 40, 1926. Could it be that these watercolour drawings are in actual myriads of their own, to be found in the herbarium?