Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 28 · DO #4952 · 260_Traub_Bx2FF6_r

Collection
Hamilton Paul Traub (1890–1983) correspondence on the formation of the National Horticultural Society
Item/Folder
Correspondence, 1922–1923
Digital Object
DO #4952, page 28
Collection-level dates
1922–1925
Open PDF at page 28 ↗

Page transcription

headquarters of the Society. The headquarters will help a lot,
but I thought that it would be best to wait until there are about
ten members on the Board of Trustees before proceeding to establish
permanent headquarters for the Society. That will make it more
representative. Your suggestion, however, is most certainly a good
one, and we should probably decide upon permanent headquarters just
as soon as it can be done. Any further suggestions on this point
are always in order. As a member of the Board of Trustees it is
your privilege to offer suggestions at all times, and your advice
will always be given the greatest consideration.

I shall be pleased to act upon your other suggestion, that
of giving the list of names of those who send in books or specimens
and this ought to act as a stimulus to others to send in material.

I am settled as much as a single man can be settled, but it
seems that it might be a lot of effort wasted to assemble a permanent
collection and then be obliged to move it later on, and for that
reason I am doing experimental work along horticultural lines and I
am specializing on that. I have done as you have---I have tried out
everything I could procure from bananas, pineapples, figs, cransums, etc
and almost all the plants that are hardy in this climate. This of
course is very interesting work but I am looking forward to the time
when I will assemble my permanent collection which shall include all
the species of plants that can be made to grow. Besides experimenting
I have tested out hundreds of iris and peony seedlings, and I hope to
introduce some of my varieties into the trade later on.