Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 197 · DO #496 · 204_Popenoe_Bx41Volume11r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Field notes: "Guatemalan Explorations, 1916–1917", 1916–1917
Digital Object
DO #496, page 197
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 197 ↗

Page transcription

184
spala has resulted in an intensive horticultural development in these regions. Coffee, fruit and vegetables are all grown more extensively in such spots than in less favored regions. Among other great trees which abound in the aguacate is one of the commonest:

Since an occasional yielding aguacate is of superior quality, at least when grown under favorable cultural conditions, it is natural that in such spots as Antigua, San Cristóbal, Orosi, and Patalagache, where the land-water conditions are eminently favorable and when there are many trees, there should be found a larger number of good aguacates than in other places where the environment is less favorable, and where there are a small number of trees, or in other words, fewer chances.

Cook and others have spoken of the intimate knowledge which the Indians of tropical America often possess concerning the plants which they live among, and have used. A close association with the Indians on the part of botanists, in order to gather from them what their long experience has taught them.

It has seemed to me from a brief association with the Indians of northern Guatemala, that their knowledge of wild plants had not been overestimated by Cook. They have a name for nearly every tree in the forest known to them, concerning its habits, and frequently possess full details likewise concerning the medicinal or other uses to which the plant can be put.

Their knowledge of horticultural methods and practices, however, is not so deep in their knowledge of wild plants and their uses. Along agricultural lines they have their well established practices, which seem largely to be traditions, and still prepare the ground, plant, and cultivate their corn by the same methods employed before the conquest. Their horticultural practices seem even less clearly defined than those pertaining to agriculture, the production of the great staple crop, corn, naturally receiving more attention than