Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 284 · DO #496 · 204_Popenoe_Bx41Volume11r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Field notes: "Guatemalan Explorations, 1916–1917", 1916–1917
Digital Object
DO #496, page 284
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 284 ↗

Page transcription

This fruit is light green in color, with very numerous, ample, yellowish dots. The skin is pale green in color close to the flesh and 2-1/4 mm in thickness. The flesh is dull white throughout, not changing color toward the skin as in the aguacate. Here is no fiber, but slight fiber tracings are visible, especially toward the outer portion of the flesh. To capture the flesh too firm, rather more compactly than in the aguacate, and yielding a thick milk white juice when pressed. The seed coats vary from 2 to 4 mm in thickness; they are separable from each other and adhere closely to the seed. In character the seed resembles that of the aguacate, but the cotyledons are of a deeper pink color, and somewhat rougher on the surface than is common in the Guatemalan type of aguacate.

When the green fruit is cut, the flesh is sticky (Cuculaginous)

The coyó is here called kiyo' in place of coyó

The coyó described in the preceding pages is a much contrast to the coyos seen commonly in the market. The latter are unattractive in appearance and scarcely palatable. In a comparison the former is a fine sweet fruit, the equal of the coyó.

The coyos seen in the markets are nearly all small ones, a great many of which are of uniform size. They were dark green when ripe, and marked with brown. The flesh, such in fruits of this nature, is quite scanty, due to the large seed, and light brown in color, coarsely granular in texture, often times with rough fibers running through it. The flavor, however, is good and strongly suggestive of coconut, and very oily.

These ordinary coyos are not worth growing in the United States, but the large one shown on the preceding pages certainly is, and I have obtained seeds of the ordinary ones to grow grafting stock. Following are outlines of two fruits of the ordinary type: