Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

plant collecting and fieldwork in South America medicinal, culinary, or other traditional uses of plants chromosomes and plant classification early herbals and botanical illustrations botanical institutions exchanging plants, seeds, and specimens microscopy and photomicrography in botanical research How did botanists and gardeners introduce plants from one region to another? grafting, budding, and propagation of tropical fruit crops

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 27 · DO #5011 · 179_Langman_Bx1FF14_r

Collection
Ida Kaplan Langman (1904–1991) papers
Item/Folder
Article reviews by others, 1960–1972
Digital Object
DO #5011, page 27
Collection-level dates
1919–1980
Open PDF at page 27 ↗

Page transcription

Langmann, Ida Kaplan: A selected guide to the literature on the flowering plants of Mexico. — Philadelphia (Univ. Pennsylvania Press) 1964, 1015 S. 4°. Preis 25 $.

Der Verfasserin ist es gangen wie vielen Botanikern, die in Mexiko Pflanzen sammelten und bei dem Versuch, sie zu bestimmen, durch das Fehlen einer zusammenfassenden Flora empfindlich behindert wurden. Sie hat daraus aber eine positive Folgerung gezogen und die notwendige Zusammenstellung der Literatur in Angriff genommen. In 24 Jahren hat sie dieses Werk vollendet, das allein schon durch seinen Umfang Achtung gebietet. Über das ursprüngliche Ziel hinaus sind außer systematischen und floristischen Arbeiten auch solche über Anatomie, Embryologie, Zytologie, Genetik, über Nutzpflanzen, einheimische Pflanzennamen, Forschungsreisen u. a. aufgenommen worden.

Das Werk ist in der praktischen Weise angelegt, die man oft an Arbeiten aus den USA bewundert. Über die technischen Entscheidungen, die die Verfasserin dabei treffen mußte, legt sie in der Einleitung Rechenschaft ab. Ihr leitender Gedanke war dabei immer die Benutzbarkeit für Botaniker. Einige zum Teil scherzhafte Bemerkungen anderer Bibliographien werden der historischen Ehrwürdigkeit vorangestellt.

Der sachliche Vorzug des Werkes besteht in den kurzen Angaben über den Inhalt der Arbeiten. Die Verfasserin hat mit Fachkenntnis alles Erreichbare selbst durchgesehen. Sie hat die Auswertung aber noch weiter getrieben, die Aufzählung alphabetisch nach Autoren, ergänzt auf 156 Seiten Quart in Kleindruck ein bescheiden als Index bezeichnetes Sachregister, das botanische und einheimische Pflanzennamen, Orts- und Personennamen und sachliche Stichworte aus den verschiedenen Gebieten der Botanik enthält.

Ich glaube, daß kein Benutzer des Werkes Grund hat, einen Satz der Vorbemerkungen anzuwenden: "The specialist tends rather to criticize than to praise", sondern daß es allgemein mit Dankbarkeit aufgenommen werden wird.
F. MARKGRAF, Zürich.