Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 105 · DO #5020 · 179_Langman_Bx1FF26_r

Collection
Ida Kaplan Langman (1904–1991) papers
Item/Folder
Grant proposals, etc., 1959–1964
Digital Object
DO #5020, page 105
Collection-level dates
1919–1980
Open PDF at page 105 ↗

Page transcription

Name and Address of Institution
University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pa

Name of Principal Investigator
Dr. John M. Fogg

Title of Proposed Research
Preparation of a Selected Guide to the Literature on the Flowering Plants of Mexico

Description of Proposed Research
A. Need for bibliography
Although the flora of Mexico has been studied and described for more than 400 years, during which time a vast literature has been accumulated, there exists no comprehensive guide to this material. Descriptions of plants must be searched for not only in botanical publications, but also in travel accounts, pharmaceutical and medical works, agricultural and ethnobotanical publications. Furthermore, since many of the explorations of Mexico and plant collections were made by visitors from outside Mexico, the reports on the plants have appeared in publications from many parts of the world, mainly England, Germany, France and the United States. The value of the bibliography when completed has already been attested to by scholars in various fields. Requests for information have already been received and answered, from students in various fields and in all cases it was possible to supply valuable references which had not been known to the student previously.

B. Scope
as is

C. Work Accomplished to date
About 7500 items have been collected so far, most of them from books and separately paged publications. Material has thus far been collected from all the important libraries in Philadelphia, New York, Washington, Boston, New Orleans, Chicago, the John Carter Brown Library in Providence in Providence, the Rare Books Division of the Army Medical Library in Cleveland, the Lloyd Library in Cincinnati and the Missouri Botanical Garden in St. Louis. In addition, a year was spent in Mexico, on a travel and maintenance grant from the U.S. State Department. During this time, material was collected from libraries in Mexico City and from a few cities outside the capital: Veracruz, Merida, Campeche, and Oaxaca.

D. Work still to be done
Material still remains to be examined in Texas and California libraries. In the field of magazines and serial publications, only those from Mexico have been reviewed in any degree of completeness. Still to be reviewed, also, are magazines from regions of the world, other than Mexico in addition to a number of Mexican magazines whose files were not complete, or could not be located.