Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 9 · DO #5025 · 179_Langman_Bx1FF31_r

Collection
Ida Kaplan Langman (1904–1991) papers
Item/Folder
Philadelphia Botanical Club, 1942–1951
Digital Object
DO #5025, page 9
Collection-level dates
1919–1980
Open PDF at page 9 ↗

Page transcription

Now a word about my collecting. I started out to collect originally for the Academy, with duplicates fo the Department of Agriculture, so that I could ask the staff there to identify the problem specimens for me. After I was in Mexico a short time, I added 2 other agencies to my list of recipients: one the Mexican Dept' of Agriculture, because it requires that, before any plants maybe sent out of the country, duplicates of all plants collected be deposited with them; the other, the University of Mexico, whose staff helped me identify many plants while I was in the country. So almost all my specimens, you see, were collected in quadruplicate.

Naturally, I was very anxious to bring back an extensive collection of plants with perhaps, a new species here and there for excitement. But I did not collect as much as I might have, because so many other interests competed with botany for my time.

The first was sightseeing. I must confess I am an indefatigable sightseer and Mexico offers a tremendous lot to the person who follows guidebooks: places of historic interest, buildings outstanding from an architectural point of view, remarkable archaeological sites like the Pyramids near Mexico City and the Monte alben and Mitla ruins near Oaxaca; artistic displays like the famous Rivera and Orozco murals, etc.

Secondly, Mexico as a workshop in social change is intensely interesting, and more than once, I took time off from my botanizing to find out what was going on in Mexico, on the educational, religious, economic, political or social scene.

But the most insidious source of temptation away from botany was the native life itself. We visited the markets to see and taste at first hand Mexico's foods—especially the fruits and vegetables strange to us: mango, mamey, zapote, jicama, chirimoya, etc.—and to observe the Indians in their colorful costumes. We attended fiestas where we might see the picturesque native dancers; we went to the homes of the natives to watch them work at the varied handicrafts like weaving, pottery making, wood carving etc.

Mr. Langman, who had agreed originally to help take pictures of the Mexican plants, became so entranced by these other aspects of Mexican life that I'm afraid the botanical end of the photography suffered considerably. In short, we were on this trip again, more the tourists than the botanists—at no time did we camp out; we always returned to our hotel or boarding house for our evening meal and a comfortable bed. We took no trips on horseback or burro and all our hiking was done on wagon roads or on well-traveled trails.

When all these points are taken into account, and are added to the fact that in most of the places where we lived there is no rain from October to May, and the marked decrease, therefore, in the number of plants in flower, it is not surprising that my total collection for the year was quite small (less than a 1000 different species) most of them however in quadruplicate, as I have already mentioned.