Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 21 · DO #524 · 204_Popenoe_Scrapbook3r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Newspaper articles, reprints on tropical fruits [most  by Wilson Popenoe] 40 × 28.5 × 2.5 cm., 1911–1913
Digital Object
DO #524, page 21
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 21 ↗

Page transcription

FEBRUARY, 1912
THE CUBA MAGAZINE

Feijoa and White Sapote
Feljao Sellowiana
Casimiroa Edulis.

By F. W. POOPENOE,
Altadena, California.

THE FEIJOA is a fruit which is attracting considerable attention in California. It is a Myrtaceous shrub, very similar to its near relative, the Guava. It grows to an ultimate height of ten or twelve feet, and is of considerable value as an ornamental alone. The leaves are small, oval, dark green above and silvery white beneath, and the flowers, which are produced in spring, are very striking, the long tufted violet stamens forming a brilliant contrast with the white petals.

The Feijoa is a native of Uruguay, Argentina, and Brazil, and was first introduced to cultivation in North America by Dr. Franceschi of Santa Barbara, California, in 1901. The fruit is about the size of a hen's egg, ordinarily oval in form, and green in color, with sometimes a touch of crimson on the cheek. The flesh is white, translucent, and melting, and of the most delicious flavor imaginable, combining the flavors of pineapple, strawberry, and banana.

One of the first tropical fruits introduced into California was the White Sapote, or Sapote Blanco, a native of northern and central Mexico. This fruit, while not yet produced in any great quantity, bids fair to become quite popular in the near future.

The tree is a rapid grower and very hardy. It is an evergreen, with glossy dark green foliage, the leaves palmate and of good size. In addition to its economic value it is quite ornamental, and possesses the characteristic of being extremely drought-resistant, thus making it valuable for planting in arid countries.

The fruits resemble in appearance an apple or a quince, and good specimens are from three to four inches in diameter. The flesh is whitish or creamy yellow, and contains three to five large seeds, very much like orange seeds on a larger scale. It is soft and melting when fully ripe, and of a flavor difficult to describe, but liked by almost everyone, and sometimes said to resemble that of the peach; it lacks, however, any trace of acidity or spiciness.

When grown from seed the White Sapote is liable to come true to type, and to obtain best results from this fruit it will be necessary to resort to some means of asexual propagation, so that the choicest seedling forms can be perpetuated. As yet grafting or budding have not been practiced, although it is probable they should not be successfully accomplished.

Among the seedlings which have fruited in California are several which are above the average in quality, and have been named as choice varieties. These are the Harvey, Gillespie, and Perquim, and it is expected that these will soon be put on the market in the form of budded or grafted trees.

The culture of the White Sapote presents no difficulties, it being one of the easiest fruits to grow, and is now in full cultivation in California. It flourishes in almost any soil, and requires but little irrigation during the dry months. When grown from seed it does not bear under an age of seven or eight years, but it stands to reason that budded trees would bear much younger.