Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 56 · DO #524 · 204_Popenoe_Scrapbook3r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Newspaper articles, reprints on tropical fruits [most  by Wilson Popenoe] 40 × 28.5 × 2.5 cm., 1911–1913
Digital Object
DO #524, page 56
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 56 ↗

Page transcription

EVENING HERALD: SATURDAY, JUNE 15, 1912.

Don't Call It "Alligator Pear" or "Avocado" but "AHUACATE"
It Is Successfully Grown in Southern California and Is a Fruit of High Value as Food
BY F. W. POPENOE
From a Paper Read Before the State Fruit Growers

RIGHT in the beginning I want to say that it is greatly to be regretted that this fruit has come established in California under a misleading and meaningless name. I refer to the term "alligator pear," which certainly has no excuse for existence, and invariably gives those who are unfamiliar with the fruit a wrong impression of it.
The name "avocado," however, can be said to be scarcely less objectionable.
The correct name is "ahuacate."

In tropical America the ahuacate is not placed in the same category as other fruits, but is considered as a staple food product of equal importance with rice and beans as a part of the daily diet.
Laborers going into the fields carry with them one or two ahuacates as a substantial part of their noonday meal.
Americans going to the tropics become familiar with this fruit, almost inevitably learning to relish it as one of the most delicious and satisfying of tropical products, and at the same time one which can supply a part of their daily nourishment.
Returning to the United States the traveler goes into ecstasies at the sight of "ahuacate salad" on the menu.
Learning that the fruit can be grown in California, he immediately asks why it is not extensively planted and made a part of our daily food.
The ahuacate has now progressed to the stage where its bearing in different ability to California is questioned.
Every year a number of young trees come into bearing in different orchards to test whether sufficient facts at our command to prove that the ahuacate is entirely successful in a large area.
During the past few years fully 100,000 seedlings have been grown at various points south of the Tehachapi.
Many of these are being budded or grafted.
The difficulties of propagation, which were considerable during the first few years, have now been practically overcome, and the production of budded trees can go on at a fairly rapid rate.
Already several small acreages of budded tree have been set out, and the coming year will see a total planting of 200 acres, as a conservative estimate.
Innumerable trees will go into small home gardens and back yards, and the taste and interest of an ahuacate in the door-yard is appealing to everyone.
The varieties now propagated and introduced to the trade are mainly of local origin.
The difficulty and expense connected with obtaining budwood from foreign countries has been largely overcome by the quantity of trees being propagated from them, but a good start has been made in obtaining the choice varieties from budded trees which are now established here will soon supply enough budwood to permit their general use.
Of the local varieties several are first-class in every particular and would almost seem to fulfill the common requirements as we understand them at the present time.
In tropical America the ahuacate is not placed in the same category as other fruits, but is considered as a staple food product of equal importance with rice and beans as a part of the daily diet.
Laborers going into the fields carry with them one or two ahuacates as a substantial part of their noonday meal.
Americans going to the tropics become familiar with this fruit, almost inevitably learning to relish it as one of the most delicious and satisfying of tropical products, and at the same time one which can supply a part of their daily nourishment.
Returning to the United States the traveler goes into ecstasies at the sight of "ahuacate salad" on the menu.
Learning that the fruit can be grown in California, he immediately asks why it is not extensively planted and made a part of our daily food.
The ahuacate has now progressed to the stage where its bearing in different ability to California is questioned.
Every year a number of young trees come into bearing in different orchards to test whether sufficient facts at our command to prove that the ahuacate is entirely successful in a large area.
During the past few years fully 100,000 seedlings have been grown at various points south of the Tehachapi.
Many of these are being budded or grafted.
The difficulties of propagation, which were considerable during the first few years, have now been practically overcome, and the production of budded trees can go on at a fairly rapid rate.
Already several small acreages of budded tree have been set out, and the coming year will see a total planting of 200 acres, as a conservative estimate.
Innumerable trees will go into small home gardens and back yards, and the taste and interest of an ahuacate in the door-yard is appealing to everyone.
The varieties now propagated and introduced to the trade are mainly of local origin.
The difficulty and expense connected with obtaining budwood from foreign countries has been largely overcome by the quantity of trees being propagated from them, but a good start has been made in obtaining the choice varieties from budded trees which are now established here will soon supply enough budwood to permit their general use.
Of the local varieties several are first-class in every particular and would almost seem to fulfill the common requirements as we understand them at the present time.
The propagation of most of them has only begun recently, and no certainty of stock is yet available, but another season will see quite a change in this respect.
The best method of transplanting ahuacates has been found to be early spring, after danger from frost is over, but before the tree has started into new growth.
The ahuacate requires an abundance of water, especially during the first two or three years.
On the whole, the tree seems to require about the same treatment as the orange.
It will stand more frost than the orange.
Viewed, therefore, from every standpoint it may be said that this fruit is the most promising that has been brought within the attention of California orchardists for many years.