Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 40 · DO #963 · 319_Love_Bx1FF8r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
"Yugoslavia"
Digital Object
DO #963, page 40
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 40 ↗

Page transcription

24.

HORVAT, I. 19.. (Iris macedonica)

HORVAT, I. & HORVAT, M. 1962: Iris crotistica - (Serbian title)........
Acta Bot. Croatica 20-21: .......

JANCHEN, E. 1956 - 1967: Catalogus Florae Austriae. I. Teil: Pteridophyten und Anthophyten (Ferne und Blütenpflanzen). Mit Ergänzungsheften 1 - 4. - Wien.

KAZMI, S. M. A. 1964: Revision der Gattung Carduus (Compositae), Teil II. - Mitt. Bot. Statssammlung München 5: 279 - 550.

KAZUBOWSKA, T. 1955: Studies in the chromosome numbers of two species of Carduus L. from the Tatra Mts. - Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. 24: 189 - 196.

KORDYUM, E. L. 1967: Tsito-embiologiya nemasytev zontichnikh. - Kiev.

KUPFER, P. & PAVARGER, C. 1967: Premières prospectus caryologiques dans la flore orophile des Pyrénées et de la Sierra Nevada. - C. r. Acad. Sci. Paris 264: 2463 - 2465.

LEVAN, A. 1940: Note on the somatic chromosomes of some Colchicum species. - Hereditas 26: 317 - 320.

LINCHEVSKII, I. A. 1962: Amphoricarpus Vis. - Flore SSSR 27: 74 - 77.

LÖVE, A. 1970: Íalensk ferdaflóra. - Reykjavík.

LÖVE, A. 1971: IOPB chromosome number reports XXXIV. - Taxon 20: 785 - 797.

LÖVE, A. 1972: IOPB chromosome number reports XXXVI. - Taxon 21: 333 - 346.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1942: Chromosome numbers of Scandinavian plant species. - Bot. Notiser 1942: 19 - 59.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1948: Chromosome numbers of Northern plant species. - Icel. Univ. Inst. Appl. Sci., Dept. Agric., Rep. B,5: 1 - 151.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1956: Cytotaxonomical conspectus of the Icelandic flora. - Acta Horti Gotob. 20: 65 - 291.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1961: Chromosome numbers of central and northwest European plant species. - Opera Botanica 5: 1 - 551.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1972s: Cytotaxonomical atlas of the flora of Slovenia. - Computerized, Boulder & Ljubljana.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1972b: Favergera and Gentianodes, two new genera of Gentianaceae. - Bot. Notiser 125:xxx - xxx.

LÖVE, A. & LÖVE, D. 1972c: Verneulenia - a new genus of orchids. - Acta Bot. Neerl. 21: xxx - xxx.