Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 24 · DO #965 · 319_Love_Bx1FF10r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
"Gentianinae"
Digital Object
DO #965, page 24
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 24 ↗

Page transcription

23.

The species G. asclepiades L. of western Asiatic and central and south European mountains was included in the section Pneumonanthe by Kusnetzov (1895, 1896-1904) and Smith (in Nilsson 1967a). It stands, however, apart from all the other species of this group not only morphologically but also palynologically and cytologically, with its basic chromosome number x = 11. Grossheim (1952) placed it in a distinct series Asclepiadeae of the section Pneumonanthe together with the west Asiatic G. schistocalyx C. Koch and the east Asiatic G. scabra Bge. He distinguished this group from other taxa of his section Pneumonanthe (with winged seeds by aid of the corolla plaits being short and either entire or toothed, the leaves elongate-acuminate, and the flowers large, blue, and 5-merous. Although G. scabra is similar to the other two species in these characters, it can be distinguished without difficulty by its terminal cluster of bracteolate flowers with well developed plaits, as contrasted to the flowers of the other species which are in the leaf axils, always without bracteoles and with short plaits. G. scabra also differs in its pollen morphology, and since it is known to have 2n = 26 chromosomes, it seems most reasonable to retain it in the restricted section Pneumonanthe of the genus Tretorhiza, as T. scabra (Bge.) Löve & Löve which is validated below. The other species of Grossheim's series Asclepiadeae are characterized by the basic chromosome number x = 11 and distinctly smaller chromosomes, in addition to morphological and palynological differences that set them apart as a genus in its own right. The valid name available for this group is Dasystephane Adans. (Dandy 1967) in its original and restricted sense when species other than D. asclepiades (L.) Borckh. included in it by Borckhausen (1796) are excluded. As far as we are aware, the only other species to be included in the genus Dasystephane is the western Asiatic D. schistocalyx (C. Koch) Löve & Löve, as transferred below.