Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 59 · DO #969 · 319_Love_Bx1FF14r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
"Proposals", 1968–1972
Digital Object
DO #969, page 59
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 59 ↗

Page transcription

present understanding of their possible history, special studies of selected groups are more likely to give us definite answers to some of the most crucial questions raised. Nevertheless, such special cases cannot easily be selected before certain general studies have been made, and so we are forced to spend considerable time to complete the general survey of the cytotaxonomy of these floras before we can concentrate on special cases. However, special groups are being selected from time to time whenever species or genera are found to be promising for detailed studies by aid of transplant and hybridization experiments.

We and other cytotaxonomists working with the arctic-alpine plants regard it as most important to get information about the chromosome number of all the species of this element as soon as possible, to secure the use of the biological species concept as a background for these general and special investigations on the history and origin of the flora as a whole. Thanks to several cytotaxonomists in many lands, much of this basic work has already been accomplished. The chromosome number is now known in more than eighty per cent of the species of the arctic and hemi-arctic zones, somewhat less in Asia, somewhat more in the Atlantic sector, and up to one hundred per cent in Iceland, which has been studied by us. The chromosome numbers of some Asiatic mountain plants have been thoroughly counted by Sokolovskaja and Strelkova, those of the plants of the Alps are being studied by Favarger and his group, and those of the plants of the Polish Tatra Mountains by Skalińska and her associates, continued under the guidance of our former associate, Pogan. Most other boreal mountain floras remain very insufficiently known. Some Japanese botanists, mainly Funabiki and our former students Kawano and Tateoka, have made pilot studies of the chromosome numbers of Japanese alpine plants, and our one-time associate, Packer, has made reasonably intensive studies of the chromosome numbers of plants from alpine situations in Alberta and Alaska. We and our associates in Montreal and Boulder have made certain introductory studies of the alpine floras of the Sierra Nevada complex in Spain, in the mountains of Gaspé, the Green Mountains of Vermont, and in the Alberta and Colorado Rockies, and completed an analysis of the cytotaxonomy of the entire flora of alpine plants on Mt. Washington in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Contrary to some of the plants that we have already observed in the Colorado Rockies, the alpine flora of the White Mountains in the East seems to have dispersed southwards from the northlands at a relatively late date.