Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 60 · DO #969 · 319_Love_Bx1FF14r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
"Proposals", 1968–1972
Digital Object
DO #969, page 60
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 60 ↗

Page transcription

We have been working for some time on a cytotaxonomical review of the
arctic flora, similar to the chromosome list which we published in
1961 for the flora of northwest and central Europe. This checklist will
not only give complete listings of all the biological species and sub-
species of the entire circumpolar arctic flora, with simple designations
of their distribution as in our Scandinavian chromosome list from 1948,
but also informations on synonymy, and references to all publications on
chromosome numbers of the taxa listed with a critical evaluation when
appropriate. This work is being done by aid of the modern retrieval methods
of Dr. David J. Rogers of the Taximetrics Laboratory of the Department of
Biology, in connection with the creation of a complete data bank on all
plant chromosome numbers published. The arctic list certainly will be
useful as a manual for other cytotaxonomists and phytogeographers, at
the same time as it will be a gold mine for those who want to study various
aspects of chromosome numbers and polyploidy and their connections with
various phytogeographical phenomena.

No checklist has ever been made of the strictly alpine plants of the
mountains in the boreal zone in either hemisphere. Since we have spent
considerable time on studying the cytotaxonomy of such plants in western
Eurasia and eastern North America before commencing our present work in
western North America, we are composing such a list, in order to be able to
add to it chromosome information in a way similar to that mentioned for
the Arctic. We do not expect to be able to complete even a preliminary
list for all the boreal alpine plants for several years to come, but are
first trying to complete such lists for more limited parts of the area.
We have published preliminarily on the cytotaxonomy of the alpine plants of
Mt. Washington, N.H., and a book by Doris Löve reviewing the constitution
of that flora and our background studies of its evolutionary history is
in a completed manuscript which still waits for support for publication.
However, most of our work in the Rocky Mountains is still at a preliminary
stage and only partially published.

It is our intention to use a small part of the support asked for in
this proposal to work on these chromosome lists and the chromosome number
bank, and to complete some of the studies which we have made in other areas
and not yet published. Most of the support will, however, be used for
intensive and detailed investigations of the arctic-alpine and montane
plants of the southern Rocky Mountains and their evolutionary relationships