Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 114 · DO #1310 · Archer Vol.1_2_r

Collection
William Andrew Archer (1894–1973) papers
Item/Folder
Volume 1, 1937
Digital Object
DO #1310, page 114
Collection-level dates
1929–1964
Open PDF at page 114 ↗

Page transcription

Report on Indian Plant Uses, Smoky Valley, Austin, Nevada, Page 5.

Common name. Number. Indian name Manner of Use.
String milkweed M499 "Esha-wana" When frost comes strip outer skin
from the plant, stretch it every way,
Sagebrush M500 "Ba-habe" Leaves. Seed for physic, and for colds from
motion of thumb. Tough as fishline.
Yellow mints M501 "Unde-vich-quana" Fresh leaves used as poultice for
wounds of blood poisoning. Renew when dry.
Wild peony M502 "Batipe". Remembered chiefly as an ideal remedy for
burns or sores. Root dried powdered, applied.
Aconite M503 No Shoshone name bad enough for this known poisoner. No use.
Monkshood Stock poisoning.
Trumpet phlox M504 "Tem Paiute" Used cautiously as a borrowing from another
tribe. Plant steeped for quick, violent
physio. Patients use for venereal disease. Tea.
Oregon grape M505 None so far. Root steeped and boiled till white - it
is orange color, and tea drunk continuously
to purify the blood, until no longer needed.
It is also said to thicken the blood, and stave
off hemorrhage, which in view of the pectin known
to be in the fruit, is not surprising.
Beaded wheat grass M507 Same as foregoing.
Manna grass M506 None yet. Seed formerly gathered & mixed with the next
number for food.
Wild celery M508 "Bego" Roots cooked and used in severe colds. Tea.
Indian potatoes M509 Whole plant eaten raw or roasted.
Orobanche.