Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 16 · DO #1084 · 1_Allen_Bx2FF18r

Collection
Paul Hamilton Allen (1911–1963) papers
Item/Folder
Steyermark, Julian Alfred (1909–1988), 1940–1956., (1946–1947)
Digital Object
DO #1084, page 16
Collection-level dates
1937–1963
Open PDF at page 16 ↗

Page transcription

Box 43, Gamboa,
September 14, 19

Dear Julian:

Yesterday wall brought the first volume of the Flo
of Guatemala, which you so kindly and thoughtfully sent. I
have heard from several sources that it was an excellent j
which is more than confirmed upon personal examination. I
don't know how to thank you enough. As I skim through it,
read the localities, in the Alta Verapaz, Retalhuleu, Quez
tenango, Huehuetenango etc., all parts of Guatemala unknown
me, my mouth fairly waters, and I envy you both your unequal
privilege of seeing those untouched parts of a wonderful l
I have been in Guatemala twice, but unfortunately both time
briefly, but even in such a short stay it was evident that
far and away the most interesting of the Latin American co
I had until recently supposed that perhaps Peru might be a
but those who have seen both say that Guatemala is by far
finer of the two.

Things run along here about as you will remember, ex
ing that we are in a new location, since intense crowding
Sone has made it impossible, at least so far, to get our o
ation back. In some ways it is probably just as well, sinc
no feeling that we are here on any permanent basis. The Fl
goes forward slowly, and I'm trying to get in as good lic
possible toward its completion. I am doing rainfall maps o
place, on the meager data available, and hope to do some s
accompanying maps showing plant distribution. It all will
from perfect, since Panama presents many peculiarities not
elsewhere. Local knowledge of, or interest in, the plants
about zero. The usual answer to inquiry about native names
Pretio, ---(a long pause) Estos son flores de la naturaleza
there is not a single resident of Panama, native or foreig
is interested enough to collect so much as a single herbar
sheet. I worked on don Alejandro Mendez, Director of the M
acional for the better part of two months, trying to sell
on the idea of having school teachers in the outlying dist
send in dried specimens of interesting things, but all it
to was to have don Alejandro write a long memorial to the
calculated to display his personal erudition, but not desi
to any concrete results. Oh, well.

Lou Williams writes me that your next field to congu
be Honduras. I envy him the opportunity of being in the fie
yourself and Dr. Standley, and being able to profit by you
experience. We read in the papers in St. Louis of the exce
job you did in Ecuador and Venezuela on Quinine, and I onl
we could have gotten together & exchanged experiences.