Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 36 · DO #1003 · 319_Love_Bx2FF48r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
Yugoslavian Trip and Incident (9 of 15), 1970–1977
Digital Object
DO #1003, page 36
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 36 ↗

Page transcription

PERTINENT LITERATURE

Instead of compiling the customary incomplete lists of literature which pertains to the approach in question, reference should be given to the very thorough literature review on the Yugoslavian flora which is listed on 23 pages in Ernest Mayer's "Seznam Prapotnic in Cvetnic Slovenskega Ozemlja," published by the Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnost in 1952, with nine additional pages of references added by E. Mayer in 1963 in his comprehensive review on "Die floristische und taxonomische Tätigkeit in Jugoslawien von 1945-1961," published in Mebba 18, 1963, pp. 347-365. All pertinent cytological references to the European flora are given on almost 200 pages in A. and D. Löve's: "Chromosome numbers of Central and Northwest European plant species," published in Opera Botanica Vol. 5, 1961, pp. 1-581, and the philosophical and evolutionary background of such studies is summarized by A. Löve in an article on "The biological species concept and its evolutionary structure," originally published in Taxon 13, 1964, pp. 33-45, and recently reprinted as the first article in "Contemporary Readings in Ecology," edited by A.S. Boughey in 1969.

OUTLINE OF THE WORK

It is proposed that, based on the considerations above, the alpine flora of Yugoslavia and that of the Julian Alps of Slovenia ought to be studied cytotoxonomically by concerted American and Yugoslavian efforts. Since most recent work on the flora has been carried out from the well-equipped Department of Botany of the University of Ljubljana, where good facilities for cultivation in a botanical garden and greenhouses are available and also some laboratory space, it is proposed that this Department be established as the main base of the investigations, later perhaps to be widened by subbases, at Departments of Botany at other Universities. Although there is some difficulty in planning other participation before the work has commenced, it is anticipated that students from other universities will join in the work in later years, so that the program may ultimately involve all such institutions in the country, while from the beginning professors from Belgrade and Skopje will act as consultants for the project.

In order to determine exactly the chromosome numbers of the various species, collections will be made in the field of fixed root-tips and flower buds from properly vouchered specimens. Various fixing media will be used, and determinations will be made with the microscope in the field as well as in the laboratories. Since fixtions made in the field in warm climates sometimes have a tendency not to give proper results, living material of every species that does not give results at once in the field will be transplanted into pots in Ljubljana for later re-fixation. In the case of annual plants, seeds will be collected for cultivation in the botanical garden at Ljubljana, and such seeds will also be collected from selected annual and perennial material for further biosystematic investigations in Boulder.

In addition to the cytological investigations, critical species will also be compared in great detail during the winter, by aid of ordinary